Segmenting uncertain demand in group-buying auctions

被引:48
作者
Chen, Jian [3 ]
Kauffman, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yunhui [4 ]
Song, Xiping [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Phoenix, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Comp & Informat, Phoenix, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Res Ctr Contemporary Management, Key Res Inst Humanities & Social Sci Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] China Shenhua Coal Liquid & Chem Co Ltd, Beijing 100011, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Consumer behavior; Bidding strategy; Demand uncertainty; Economic analysis; Electronic markets; Group-buying auctions; Market mechanism; Posted-price mechanism; Simulation; Uncertainty risk; PRICE DISPERSION; DISCOUNTS; INTERNET; STRATEGY; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.elerap.2009.03.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Demand uncertainty is a key factor in a seller's decision-making process for products sold through online auctions. We explore demand uncertainty in group-buying auctions in terms of the extent of low-valuation demand and high-valuation demand. We focus on the analysis of a monopolistic group-buying retailer that sells products to consumers who express different product valuations. We also examine the performance of a group-buying seller who faces competitive posted-price sellers in a market for the sale of the same products, under similar assumptions about uncertain demand. Based on a Nash equilibrium analysis of bidder strategies for both of these seller-side competition structures, we are able to characterize the group-buying auction bidders' dominant strategies. We obtained a number of interesting findings. Group-buying is likely to be more effective in settings where there is larger low-valuation demand than high-valuation demand. The structure of demand matters. This finding has relevance to the marketplace for new cameras, next-generation microprocessors and computers, and other high-valuation goods, which are unlikely to be as effectively sold in group-buying markets. We obtained additional results for the case of continuous demand, and find that there is a basis for the seller to improve revenues via effective group-buying auction price curve design. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 147
页数:22
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Group buying on the Web: A comparison of price-discovery mechanisms [J].
Anand, KS ;
Aron, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (11) :1546-1562
[2]  
[Anonymous], RES EXPT EC
[3]  
BANGEMAN E, 2006, ARSTECHNICA 0312
[4]   Analysis and design of business-to-consumer online auctions [J].
Bapna, R ;
Goes, P ;
Gupta, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (01) :85-101
[5]   A theoretical and empirical investigation of multi‐item on‐line auctions [J].
Ravi Bapna ;
Paulo Goes ;
Alok Gupta .
Information Technology and Management, 2000, 1 (1-2) :1-23
[6]   Beyond the hype of frictionless markets: Evidence of heterogeneity in price rigidity on the Internet [J].
Bergen, ME ;
Kauffman, RJ ;
Lee, D .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 22 (02) :57-89
[7]   Stockout compensation: Joint inventory and price optimization in electronic retailing [J].
Bhargava, HK ;
Sun, DW ;
Xu, SH .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2006, 18 (02) :255-266
[8]   Does the Internet make markets more competitive? Evidence from the life insurance industry [J].
Brown, JR ;
Goolsbee, A .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2002, 110 (03) :481-507
[9]   Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers [J].
Brynjolfsson, E ;
Smith, MD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (04) :563-585
[10]   Buy prices in online auctions: irrationality on the internet? [J].
Budish, EB ;
Takeyama, LN .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2001, 72 (03) :325-333