Relative importance of cohesion and adhesion for sensory stickiness of semisolid foods

被引:27
作者
Dunnewind, B
Janssen, AM
Van Vliet, T
Weenen, H
机构
[1] Wageningen Ctr Food Sci, NL-6700 EV Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Nutr & Food Res, NL-3700 AJ Zeist, Netherlands
[3] Agr & Food Innovat, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Numico R&D, Schiphol Rijk, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-4603.2004.35512.x
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Sensory stickiness (sticky mouthfeel) was hypothesized to result from the viscoelastic and adhesive properties of a foodstuff. The objective of the present study was to investigate the relative importance of these two properties. Measurements consisted of compression - decompression cycles on a texture analyzer, with product, type of surface, the presence or absence of saliva and compression regime as variables. Products included commercial mayonnaises, custard desserts and warm sauces, varying in apparent viscosity (at shear rate of 10 s(-1)) between 0.3 and 18.3 Pa.s. Fairly good models were obtained, predicting sensory stickiness with R-2 = 0.85-0.92. The predictive value of the mathematical models did not increase when the surface characteristics approached those of the human tongue (use of porcine lingual mucosa). Different surfaces or the use of saliva resulted in differences in the absolute values of the parameters, but their relative values when comparing different products did not change. The parameters appearing in the predictive models represented product characteristics only. The type of surface was not an important factor in determining differences in sensory stickiness between these samples. For the products used in this study, adhesion was large enough to prevent detachment of the sample from the surfaces, i.e., adhesion was not limiting. Variations in perceived stickiness could be explained with R-2 = 0.86, based on only two product characteristics: consistency and 'long behavior' (the extent to which necking occurs during decompression). This was better than the correlation between sensory stickiness and apparent viscosity (R-2 = 0.77), confirming the relevance of 'long behavior' for sensory stickiness.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 620
页数:18
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   In situ characterization of stickiness of sugar-rich foods using a linear actuator driven stickiness testing device [J].
Adhikari, B ;
Howes, T ;
Bhandari, BR ;
Truong, V .
JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2003, 58 (01) :11-22
[2]   Stickiness in foods: A review of mechanisms and test methods [J].
Adhikari, B ;
Howes, T ;
Bhandari, BR ;
Truong, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES, 2001, 4 (01) :1-33
[3]  
CZCZESNIAK AS, 1971, J TEXTURE STUD, V3, P206
[4]  
de Cock P., 1995, FIE'95 conference proceedings, P215
[5]   Texture of semi-solids; sensory and instrumental measurements on vanilla custard desserts [J].
de Wijk, RA ;
van Gemert, LJ ;
Terpstra, MEJ ;
Wilkinson, CL .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2003, 14 (04) :305-317
[6]   Instrumental measurement of adhesiveness in solid and semi-solid foods.: A survey [J].
Fiszman, SM ;
Damásio, MH .
JOURNAL OF TEXTURE STUDIES, 2000, 31 (01) :69-91
[7]   Instrumental measurement of stickiness of doughs and other foods [J].
Hoseney, RC ;
Smewing, J .
JOURNAL OF TEXTURE STUDIES, 1999, 30 (02) :123-136
[8]  
KAMPP J, 1995, FOOD INGR EUR C P, P205
[9]   LACK OF CORRELATION BETWEEN FOOD RETENTION ON THE HUMAN DENTITION AND CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF FOOD STICKINESS [J].
KASHKET, S ;
VANHOUTE, J ;
LOPEZ, LR ;
STOCKS, S .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1991, 70 (10) :1314-1319
[10]   Perception and measurement of stickiness in sugar-rich foods [J].
Kilcast, D ;
Roberts, C .
JOURNAL OF TEXTURE STUDIES, 1998, 29 (01) :81-100