Chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer

被引:45
作者
Burdett, S. S. [1 ]
Stewart, L. A. [1 ]
Rydzewska, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC Clin Trials Unit, Metaanal Grp, 222 Euston Rd, London NW1 2DA, England
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2007年 / 03期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD006157
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background The role of pre-operative chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was not clear. A systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis were therefore undertaken to evaluate the available evidence from randomised trials. Objectives To evaluate the effect of pre-operative chemotherapy on survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. If adequate data are available, to investigate whether or not pre-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from pre-operative chemotherapy. Search strategy MEDLINE and CANCERLIT searches for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were supplemented by information from trial registers and by handsearching relevant meeting proceedings and by discussion with relevant trialists and organisations. Selection criteria RCTs were eligible for inclusion provided the patients had been randomised between chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone and that the method of randomisation precluded prior knowledge of the treatment to be assigned. Data collection and analysis A systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data extracted from trial publications was carried out to assess the effectiveness of pre-operative chemotherapy in NSCLC. This involved identifying eligible RCTs and extracting aggregate data from the abstracts or reports of these RCTs. Hazard ratios were calculated from published summary statistics and then combined to give pooled estimates of treatment efficacy. Main results Twelve eligible RCTs were identified. Data were available from seven RCTs including 988 patients (75% of eligible patients). Preoperative chemotherapy increased survival with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69- 0.97) P = 0.022. This is equivalent to an absolute benefit of 6%, increasing overall survival across all stages of disease from 14% to 20% at 5 years. There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity ( P = 0.980, I-2= 0). Authors' conclusions This analysis shows a significant increase in survival attributable to pre-operative chemotherapy. This is currently the best estimate of the effectiveness of this therapy, but is based on a small number of trials and patients. This analysis was unable to address important questions such as whether particular types of patients may benefit more or less from pre-operative chemotherapy or whether the early stopping of a number of included RCTs impacted on the results. These issues may be addressed by an ongoing individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer:: Update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data [J].
Abol-Enein, H ;
Bassi, P ;
Boyer, M ;
Coppin, CML ;
Cortesi, E ;
Grossman, HB ;
Hall, RR ;
Horwich, A ;
Malmström, PU ;
Martinez-Piñeiro, JA ;
Sengelov, L ;
Sherif, A ;
Wallace, DMA ;
Bono, AV ;
Goebell, PJ ;
Groshen, S ;
Torti, FM ;
Clarke, NW ;
Roberts, JT ;
Sylvester, R ;
Parmar, MKB ;
Stewart, LA ;
Tierney, JF ;
Vale, CL .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (02) :202-206
[2]
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[3]
[Anonymous], 2003, COCHRANE DATABASE SY, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001556
[4]
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[5]
Survival improvement in resectable non-small cell lung cancer with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy: Results of a meta-analysis of the literature [J].
Berghmans, T ;
Paesmans, M ;
Meert, AP ;
Mascaux, C ;
Lothaire, P ;
Lafitte, JJ ;
Sculier, JP .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 (01) :13-23
[6]
Letter to the editor [J].
Burdett, S ;
Stewart, L ;
Stephens, R .
LUNG CANCER, 2005, 48 (01) :149-150
[7]
DAUTZENBERG B, 1990, CANCER, V65, P2435, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900601)65:11<2435::AID-CNCR2820651105>3.0.CO
[8]
2-2
[9]
Pre-operative chemotherapy in early stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized feasibility study justifying a multicentre phase III trial [J].
de Boer, RH ;
Smith, IE ;
Pastorino, U ;
O'Brien, MER ;
Ramage, F ;
Ashley, S ;
Goldstraw, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 79 (9-10) :1514-1518
[10]
Preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with primary surgery in resectable stage I (except T1N0), II, and IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Depierre, A ;
Milleron, B ;
Moro-Sibilot, D ;
Chevret, S ;
Quoix, E ;
Lebeau, B ;
Braun, D ;
Breton, JL ;
Lemarié, E ;
Gouva, S ;
Paillot, N ;
Bréchot, JM ;
Janicot, H ;
Lebas, FX ;
Terrioux, P ;
Clavier, J ;
Foucher, P ;
Monchâtre, M ;
Coëtmeur, D ;
Level, MC ;
Leclerc, P ;
Blanchon, F ;
Rodier, JM ;
Thiberville, L ;
Villeneuve, A ;
Westeel, V ;
Chastang, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) :247-253