Lung deposition of fenoterol and flunisolide delivered using a novel device for inhaled medicines - Comparison of RESPIMAT with conventional metered-dose inhalers with and without spacer devices

被引:110
作者
Newman, SP
Brown, J
Steed, KP
Reader, SJ
Kladders, H
机构
[1] Pharmaceut Profiles Ltd, Nottingham NG7 2QP, England
[2] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceut Inc, Div Med, Bracknell, Berks, England
[3] Boehringer Ingelheim KG, Dept Pharmaceut, D-6507 Ingelheim, Germany
关键词
flunisolide; fenoterol; gamma scintigraphy; inhaler devices; lung deposition; oropharyngeal deposition;
D O I
10.1378/chest.113.4.957
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To compare lung deposition of fenoterol or flunisolide administered from a novel, multidose inhalation device delivering liquid droplets (RESPIMAT; Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd; Bracknell, UK) or from conventional metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) with and without spacers. Design: Two randomized, three-way crossover studies. Setting: Clinical research laboratory. Participants: Healthy, nonsmoking volunteers. Interventions: Ln one study, radiolabeled aerosols of fenoterol from the RESPIMAT device and from a conventional MDI with or without an Aerochamber spacer (Trudell Medical; London, Ontario Canada). In the second study, radiolabeled aerosols of flunisolide from a RESPIMAT device, from a RESPIMAT device modified by inclusion of a baffle/impactor in the mouthpiece, and from a conventional MDI with an Inhacort spacer (Boehringer Ingelheim; Ingelheim, Germany). Measurements and results: Assessment of the deposition of fenoterol or flunisolide in the lung and oropharynx using gamma scintigraphy. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse effects and spirometry (FEV1, FVC, and peak expiratory now rate) to detect any paradoxical bronchoconstriction. The RESPIMAT device delivered significantly more fenoterol to the lungs than either an MDI alone or an MDI with Aerochamber (39.2% vs 11.0% and 9.9% of metered dose, respectively; p<0.01). Oropharyngeal deposition of fenoterol from the new device was lower than that from the MDI (37.1% vs 71.7%, respectively; p<0.01). The RESPIMAT device deposited significantly more flunisolide in the lungs compared with MDI plus spacer (44.6% vs 26.4%, respectively; p<0.01), while resulting in similar oropharyngeal deposition (26.2% vs 31.2%, respectively). Introduction of a baffle into the RESPIMAT system reduced lung deposition of flunisolide to 29.5%, and oropharyngeal deposition to 7.8% (p<0.01). Conclusion: The RESPIMAT device may prove to be an effective alternative to MDIs for the administration of inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids. The high lung deposition and low oropharyngeal deposition may lead to improved efficacy and tolerability of inhaled medications, especially corticosteroids.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 963
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Aerosol delivery systems for bronchial asthma [J].
Ariyananda, PL ;
Agnew, JE ;
Clarke, SW .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 72 (845) :151-156
[2]   INHALER TECHNIQUE IN THE ELDERLY [J].
ARMITAGE, JM ;
WILLIAMS, SJ .
AGE AND AGEING, 1988, 17 (04) :275-278
[3]   DELIVERY OF PROPELLANT SOLUBLE DRUG FROM A METERED DOSE INHALER [J].
ASHWORTH, HL ;
WILSON, CG ;
SIMS, EE ;
WOTTON, PK ;
HARDY, JG .
THORAX, 1991, 46 (04) :245-247
[4]   BRONCHOCONSTRICTOR PROPERTIES OF PRESERVATIVES IN IPRATROPIUM BROMIDE (ATROVENT) NEBULIZER SOLUTION [J].
BEASLEY, CRW ;
RAFFERTY, P ;
HOLGATE, ST .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 294 (6581) :1197-1198
[5]   PULMONARY DEPOSITION OF INHALED TERBUTALINE - COMPARISON OF SCANNING GAMMA-CAMERA AND URINARY-EXCRETION METHODS [J].
BORGSTROM, L ;
NEWMAN, S ;
WEISZ, A ;
MOREN, F .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1992, 81 (08) :753-755
[6]   LUNG DEPOSITION OF BUDESONIDE INHALED VIA TURBUHALER(R) - A COMPARISON WITH TERBUTALINE SULFATE IN NORMAL SUBJECTS [J].
BORGSTROM, L ;
BONDESSON, E ;
MOREN, F ;
TROFAST, E ;
NEWMAN, SP .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1994, 7 (01) :69-73
[7]  
CAMPBELL RG, 1995, J AEROSOL MED, V8, P101
[8]   MEDICAL AEROSOL INHALERS - PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE [J].
CLARK, AR .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 22 (04) :374-391
[9]  
CROMPTON GK, 1982, EUR J RESPIR DIS, V63, P101
[10]  
DAVIS SS, 1992, EUR J NUCL MED, V19, P971