Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: A randomized pilot study

被引:126
作者
Francisco, G
Chae, J
Chawla, H
Kirshblum, S
Zorowitz, R
Lewis, G
Pang, S
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Kessler Inst Rehabil, W Orange, NJ USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1998年 / 79卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90074-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy of electromyogram (EMG)triggered neuromuscular stimulation (EMG-stim) in enhancing upper extremity motor and functional recovery of acute stroke survivors. Design: A pilot randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Setting: Freestanding inpatient rehabilitation facility. Patients: Nine subjects who were within 6 weeks of their first unifocal, nonhemorrhagic stroke were randomly assigned to either the EMG-stim (n = 4) or control (n = 5) group. All subjects had a detectable EMG signal (>5 mu V) from the surface of the paretic extensor carpi radialis and voluntary wrist extension in synergy or in isolation with muscle grade of <3/5. Intervention: All subjects received two 30-minute sessions per day of wrist strengthening exercises with EMG-stim (experimental) or without (control) for the duration of their rehabilitation stay. Main Outcome Measures: Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer motor assessment and the feeding, grooming, and upper body dressing items of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were assessed at study entry and at discharge. Results: Subjects treated with EMG-stim exhibited significantly greater gains in Fugl-Meyer (27.0 vs 10.4; p = .05), and FIM (6.0 vs 3.4; p = .02) scores compared with controls. Conclusion: Data suggest that EMG-stim enhances the arm function of acute stroke survivors. (C) 1998 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 575
页数:6
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Anderson ME, 1993, PHYS MED REH CLIN N, V4, P623, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30550-3, 10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30550-3, 10.1016/S1047-9651, DOI 10.1016/S1047-9651]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, CONCEPTS NEUROSCIENC
  • [3] NEURONAL MECHANISMS OF MOTOR LEARNING IN MAMMALS
    ASANUMA, H
    KELLER, A
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 1991, 2 (05) : 217 - 224
  • [4] BASMAJIAN JV, 1987, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V68, P267
  • [5] BASMAJIAN JV, 1982, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V63, P613
  • [6] BASMAJIAN JV, 1977, GERIATRICS, V32, P85
  • [7] BERGLUND K, 1986, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V18, P155
  • [8] BOBATH B, 1959, Physiotherapy, V45, P279
  • [9] BRUNNSTROM S., 1970, MOVEMENT THERAPY HEM
  • [10] REPETITIVE TRAINING OF ISOLATED MOVEMENTS IMPROVES THE OUTCOME OF MOTOR REHABILITATION OF THE CENTRALLY PARETIC HAND
    BUTEFISCH, C
    HUMMELSHEIM, H
    DENZLER, P
    MAURITZ, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 130 (01) : 59 - 68