Doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cisplatin in endometrial carcinoma: definitive results of a randomised study (55872) by the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group

被引:152
作者
Aapro, MS
van Wijk, FH
Bolis, G
Chevallier, B
van der Burg, MEL
Poveda, A
de Oliveira, CF
Tumolo, S
di Palumbo, VS
Piccart, M
Franchi, M
Zanaboni, F
Lacave, AJ
Fontanelli, R
Favalli, G
Zola, P
Guastalla, JP
Rosso, R
Marth, C
Nooij, M
Presti, M
Scarabelli, C
Splinter, TAW
Ploch, E
Beex, LVA
Huinink, WT
Forni, M
Melpignano, M
Blake, P
Kerbrat, P
Mendiola, C
Cervantes, A
Goupil, A
Harper, PG
Madronal, C
Namer, M
Scarfone, G
Stoot, JEGM
Teodorovic, I
Coens, C
Vergote, I
Vermorken, JB
机构
[1] Hop Cantonal Univ Geneva, Div Oncol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] EORTC Data Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Ist L Mangiagalli, Milan, Italy
[4] Ctr Henri Becquerel, F-76038 Rouen, France
[5] Daniel den Hoed Hosp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Inst Valenciano Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[7] Hosp Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[8] Azienda Osped San Maria Degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy
[9] Osped Gen Prov San Camillo de Lellis, Riete, Italy
[10] Inst Jules Bordet, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[11] Osped Circolo Varese, Varese, Italy
[12] Fdn Macchi, Varese, Italy
[13] Inst Nazl Studio & Cura Tumori, Milan, Italy
[14] Hosp Gen Asturias, E-33006 Oviedo, Spain
[15] Univ Brescia, Brescia, Italy
[16] Osepd Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
[17] Ctr Leon Berard, F-69373 Lyon, France
[18] Osped San Martino Genova, Genoa, Italy
[19] Univ Innsbruck Klin, Innsbruck, Austria
[20] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[21] Osped Civile, Voghera, Italy
[22] Erasmus Univ Hosp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[23] Marie Sklodowska Curie Canc Ctr, Inst Oncol, Warsaw, Poland
[24] Univ Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[25] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Huis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[26] Univ Hosp Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[27] Azienda Osped Parma, Parma, Italy
[28] Royal Marsden Hosp, Sutton, Surrey, England
[29] Ctr Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
[30] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain
[31] Hosp Clin Univ Valencia, Valencia, Spain
[32] Ctr Rene Huguenin, St Cloud, France
[33] Guys Hosp, London SE1 9RT, England
[34] Inst Oncol Corachan, Barcelona, Spain
[35] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, F-06054 Nice, France
[36] Atrium Med Ctr, Heerlen, Netherlands
[37] Univ Hosp, Louvain, Belgium
[38] Free Univ Amsterdam Hosp, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
chemotherapy; cisplatin; doxorubicin; endometrial carcinoma; randomised clinical trial; phase III;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdg112
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Combination chemotherapy yields better response rates which do not always lead to a survival advantage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the reported differences in the efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with doxorubicin (DOX) versus combination therapy with cisplatin (CDDP) in endometrial adenocarcinoma lead to significant advantage in favour of the combination. Patients and methods: Eligible patients had histologically-proven advanced and/or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and were chemo-naive. Treatment consisted of either DOX 60 mg/m(2) alone or CDDP 50 mg/m(2), added to DOX 60 mg/m(2), every 4 weeks. Results: A total of 177 patients were entered and median follow-up is 7.1 years. The combination DOX-CDDP was more toxic than DOX alone. Haematological toxicity consisted mainly of white blood cell toxicity grade 3 and 4 (55% versus 30%). Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 3 and 4 alopecia (72% versus 65%) and nausea/vomiting (36% versus 12%). The combination DOX-CDDP provided a significantly higher response rate than single agent DOX (P <0.001). Thirty-nine patients (43%) responded on DOX-CDDP [13 complete responses (CRs) and 26 partial responses (PRs)], versus 15 patients (17%) on DOX alone (8 CR and 7 PR). The median overall survival (OS) was 9 months in the DOX-CDDP arm versus 7 months in the DOX alone arm (Wilcoxon P = 0.0654). Regression analysis showed that WHO performance status was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for survival, and stratifying for this factor, treatment effect reaches significance (hazard ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.03, P = 0.024). Conclusions: In comparison to single agent DOX, the combination of DOX-CDDP results in higher but acceptable toxicity. The response rate produced is significantly higher, and a modest survival benefit is achieved with this combination regimen, especially in patients with a good performance status.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 448
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AAPRO M, 1994, ANN ONCOL S8, V5, P98
[2]  
[Anonymous], P ANN M AM SOC CLIN
[3]   CIRCADIAN-TIMED COMBINATION DOXORUBICIN-CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA - A PHASE-II STUDY OF THE GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP [J].
BARRETT, RJ ;
BLESSING, JA ;
HOMESLEY, HD ;
TWIGGS, L ;
WEBSTER, KD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1993, 16 (06) :494-496
[4]  
BRUCKNER HW, 1981, CANCER, V49, P2441
[5]   TREATMENT OF ADVANCED OR RECURRENT ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA WITH SINGLE-AGENT CARBOPLATIN [J].
BURKE, TW ;
MUNKARAH, A ;
KAVANAGH, JJ ;
MORRIS, M ;
LEVENBACK, C ;
TORNOS, C ;
GERSHENSON, DM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1993, 51 (03) :397-400
[6]  
CARBONE P P, 1974, Gynecologic Oncology, V2, P348, DOI 10.1016/0090-8258(74)90025-0
[7]  
COHEN CJ, 1986, CLIN OBSTET GYNAECOL, V13, P811
[8]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[9]  
DEPPE G, 1982, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, V25, P93, DOI 10.1097/00003081-198203000-00011
[10]  
DEPPE G, 1984, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V15, P263