Buprenorphine antinociception is abolished, but naloxone-sensitive reward is retained, in μ-opioid receptor knockout mice

被引:56
作者
Ide, S
Minami, M
Satoh, M
Uhl, GR
Sora, I
Ikeda, K
机构
[1] Tokyo Inst Psychiat, Dept Mol Psychiat, Setagaya Ku, Tokyo 1568585, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Mol Pharmacol, Kyoto 606, Japan
[3] NIDA, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Psychobiol, Dept Neurosci, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
opioid receptor; knockout mice; buprenorphine; antinociception; reward; detoxification;
D O I
10.1038/sj.npp.1300463
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Buprenorphine is a relatively nonselective opioid receptor partial agonist that is used in the management of both pain and addiction. To improve understanding of the opioid receptor subtypes important for buprenorphine effects, we now report the results of our investigation on the roles of mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors in antinociceptive responses and place preferences induced by buprenorphine. Buprenorphine antinociception, assessed by hot-plate and tail-flick tests, was significantly reduced in heterozygous m- opioid receptor knockout (MOR-KO) mice and abolished in homozygous MOR-KO mice. In contrast, buprenorphine retained its ability to establish a conditioned place preference (CPP) in homozygous MOR-KO, although the magnitude of place preference was reduced as the number of copies of wild-type mu-opioid receptor genes was reduced. The remaining CPP of buprenorphine was abolished by pretreatment with the nonselective opioid antagonist naloxone, but only partially blocked by pretreatment with either the d- selective opioid antagonist naltrindole or the kappa-selective opioid antagonist norbinaltorphimine. These data, and biochemical confirmation of buprenorphine actions as a partial delta-, mu-, and kappa-agonist, support the ideas that mu-opioid receptors mediate most of analgesic properties of buprenorphine, but that mu- and delta- and/or kappa-opioid receptors are each involved in the rewarding effects of this drug.
引用
收藏
页码:1656 / 1663
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Differential opioid agonist regulation of the mouse mu opioid receptor [J].
Blake, AD ;
Bot, G ;
Freeman, JC ;
Reisine, T .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 272 (02) :782-790
[2]  
Bot G, 1998, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V284, P283
[3]   A CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF BUPRENORPHINE AND CLONIDINE FOR ACUTE DETOXIFICATION FROM OPIOIDS [J].
CHESKIN, LJ ;
FUDALA, PJ ;
JOHNSON, RE .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1994, 36 (02) :115-121
[4]   Intravenous buprenorphine self-administration by detoxified heroin abusers [J].
Comer, SD ;
Collins, ED ;
Fischman, MW .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 301 (01) :266-276
[5]   AGONIST AND ANTAGONIST PROPERTIES OF BUPRENORPHINE, A NEW ANTINOCICEPTIVE AGENT [J].
COWAN, A ;
LEWIS, JW ;
MACFARLANE, IR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 60 (04) :537-545
[6]  
D'amour FE, 1941, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V72, P74
[7]  
FUNADA M, 1993, NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, V32, P1315
[8]   A comparison of buprenorphine treatment in clinic and primary care settings: a randomised trial [J].
Gibson, AE ;
Doran, CM ;
Bell, JR ;
Ryan, A ;
Lintzeris, N .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 179 (01) :38-42
[9]   Effects of buprenorphine maintenance dose on μ-opioid receptor availability, plasma concentrations, and antagonist blockade in heroin-dependent volunteers [J].
Greenwald, MK ;
Johanson, CE ;
Moody, DE ;
Woods, JH ;
Kilbourn, MR ;
Koeppe, RA ;
Schuster, CR ;
Zubieta, JK .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 28 (11) :2000-2009
[10]   PREFERENTIAL STIMULATION OF D1 OR D2 RECEPTORS DISRUPTS FOOD-REWARDED OPERANT RESPONDING IN RATS [J].
HOFFMAN, DC ;
BENINGER, RJ .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1989, 34 (04) :923-925