Place oriented ecological footprint analysis - The case of Israel's grain supply

被引:41
作者
Kissinger, Meidad [1 ]
Gottlieb, Dan [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Geog & Environm Dev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Div Publ Adm & Policy, Sch Polit Sci, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Ecological footprint analysis; Grains; Israel; International trade; Consumption; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; WHEAT PRODUCTION; SUSTAINABILITY; AGRICULTURE; EMISSIONS; TILLAGE; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In today's world, any nation's ecological footprint is spread all over the globe. Still, most footprint studies are not yet sensitive to the specific locations on which the footprint falls and to the unique production characteristics of each supporting region. In recent years some studies have acknowledged the need to quantify the 'real land' footprints and particularly the share of the footprint embodied in trade. Our goal is to analyse the ecological footprint of grain-based consumption in the state of Israel during the last two decades. We present a detailed, place oriented calculation procedure of Israel's grain footprint on specific locations around the world. We document modes of production, major energy inputs in specific sources of supply, the energy required for shipping from each source, and the CO2 emissions from those operations. Our research reveals that most of Israel's grain footprint falls on North America followed by the Black Sea region. It also shows that while the overall consumption of grain products has increased throughout the research period, the size of the footprint has been dropping in recent years as a consequence of changing sources of supply and grain composition. Finally, we discuss some of the implications of the method presented here for future footprint calculations and environmental resource management. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1645
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EPA420F05001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, GUID DEFR GHG CONV F
[3]  
[Anonymous], FERT US CROP UKR
[4]   Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology -: II.: The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems [J].
Brentrup, F ;
Küsters, J ;
Lammel, J ;
Barraclough, P ;
Kuhlmann, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2004, 20 (03) :265-279
[5]   Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region, Turkey [J].
Canakci, M ;
Topakci, M ;
Akinci, I ;
Ozmerzi, A .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 46 (04) :655-666
[6]   Eco-localism and sustainability [J].
Curtis, F .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (01) :83-102
[7]   A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming [J].
Dalgaard, T ;
Halberg, N ;
Porter, JR .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 87 (01) :51-65
[8]  
*EMEP CORINAIR, 2007, ATM EM INV GUID
[9]   Actual land demand of Austria 1926-2000: a variation on Ecological Footprint assessments [J].
Erb, KH .
LAND USE POLICY, 2004, 21 (03) :247-259
[10]  
FAO, 2009, FERTISTAT FERT US ST