The role of noise sensitivity in the noise-response relation: A comparison of three international airport studies

被引:123
作者
van Kamp, I
Job, RFS
Hatfield, J
Haines, M
Stellato, RK
Stansfeld, SA
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ London, Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Ctr Psychiat, Inst Community Hlth Sci, London WC1E 7HU, England
[4] PricewaterhouseCoopers, Hlth Risk Management Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1810291
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In order to examine the role of noise sensitivity in response to environmental noise, this paper presents detailed comparisons of socio-acoustic studies conducted around international airports in Amsterdam, Sydney, and London. Earlier findings that noise sensitivity moderates the effect of noise on annoyance were examined to see if they could be replicated in each of the datasets, independent of the technique of measuring noise sensitivity. The relation between exposure to aircraft noise and noise annoyance was studied separately for, groups of individuals with low, medium, and high noise sensitivity, with statistical adjustment for relevant confounders. Results support the previous findings that noise sensitivity is an independent predictor of annoyance and adds to the prediction of noise annoyance afforded by noise exposure level by up to 26% of explained variance. There is no evidence of a moderating effect, whereby the covariation between noise exposure level and annoyance is weak for people who score at the extreme high or low end of the sensitivity scale, and strong for people who score in the middle of the sensitivity scale. Generally, noise sensitivity appears to increase annoyance independently of the level of noise exposure after adjustment for relevant confounders. These findings were consistent across the three datasets. (C) 2004 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:3471 / 3479
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ANDERSON CMB, 1971, 52 NATL PHYSL LAB
[2]  
ANN KS, 1986, HLTH SCI NURSING, V47, pB991
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions
[4]  
BATHIA P, 1996, J PERS CLIN STUD, V12, P55
[5]   Subjective reactions to traffic noise with regard to some personality traits [J].
Belojevic, G ;
Jakovljevic, B ;
Aleksic, O .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 23 (02) :221-226
[6]   EFFECTS OF NOISE ON MENTAL PERFORMANCE WITH REGARD TO SUBJECTIVE NOISE SENSITIVITY [J].
BELOJEVIC, G ;
OHRSTROM, E ;
RYLANDER, R .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1992, 64 (04) :293-301
[7]  
BROWN AL, 1978, 20606 AIR
[8]   COMMUNITY REACTION TO NOISE FROM AN ARTILLERY RANGE [J].
BULLEN, RB ;
HEDE, AJ ;
JOB, RFS .
NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1991, 37 (03) :115-128
[9]   REACTION TO AIRCRAFT NOISE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AROUND AUSTRALIAN AIRPORTS [J].
BULLEN, RB ;
HEDE, AJ ;
KYRIACOS, E .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1986, 108 (02) :199-225
[10]   COMPARISON OF CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSES TO NOISE DURING WAKING AND SLEEPING IN HUMANS [J].
DINISI, J ;
MUZET, A ;
EHRHART, J ;
LIBERT, JP .
SLEEP, 1990, 13 (02) :108-120