Combined ultrasound biometry, serum markers and age for Down syndrome risk estimation

被引:23
作者
Bahado-Singh, RO [1 ]
Oz, AU [1 ]
Gomez, K [1 ]
Hunter, D [1 ]
Copel, J [1 ]
Baumgarten, A [1 ]
Mahoney, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
ultrasound biometry; serum triple screen; Down syndrome risk;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00071.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To compare Down syndrome screening efficiency of the standard serum triple analyte screen to that of a four-component screen consisting of ultrasound biometry and serum markers in the second trimester. Methods The Down syndrome screening efficiency of the triple screen, i.e. alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), unconjugated estriol (E3), hCG and maternal age, was compared with the four-marker algorithm, i.e. humerus length, nuchal thickness, AFP and hCG plus maternal age. A quadrivariate Gaussian algorithm was used to calculate individual Down syndrome odds. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves plotting sensitivity against false-positive rate were constructed for each algorithm and the areas under the curves were compared to determine which was superior Sensitivity and false-positive rates at different Down syndrome risk thresholds were also compared. Results There were 46 cases of Down syndrome (1.9%) with 2391 normal singleton pregnancies in a referral population in which triple screen, fetal biometry and karyotype had been done. The gestational age range for the study was 14-24 completed weeks. The median maternal age for the study group was 35.0 years (14.0-46.0 years). The areas (SE) under the ROC curves were 0.75(0.04) and 0.93(0.02) for the standard triple and the four-marker screen, respectively (P < 0.001). At a 10% false-positive rate, detection was 45.7% for the triple and 80.4% for the four-marker screen. Conclusions A new algorithm combining humerus length and nuchal thickness measurement with serum AFP, hCG and maternal age substantially improved Down syndrome screening efficiency compared with the traditional triple screen. The model appears promising and should be evaluated in an independent data set.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 204
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*ACOG, 1996, ACOG ED B, V228
[2]   An alternative for women initially declining genetic amniocentesis: Individual Down syndrome odds on the basis of maternal age and multiple ultrasonographic markers [J].
Bahado-Singh, R ;
Deren, O ;
Oz, U ;
Tan, A ;
Hunter, D ;
Copel, J ;
Mahoney, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (02) :514-519
[3]  
Bahado-Singh R O, 1999, J Matern Fetal Med, V8, P37, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199903/04)8:2<37::AID-MFM1>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-P
[5]   New Down syndrome screening algorithm. Ultrasonographic biometry and multiple serum markers combined with maternal age [J].
Bahado-Singh, RO ;
Oz, AU ;
Kovanci, E ;
Deren, O ;
Copel, J ;
Baumgarten, A ;
Mahoney, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (06) :1627-1631
[6]   Risk of Down syndrome and any clinically significant chromosome defect in pregnancies with abnormal triple-screen and normal targeted ultrasonographic results [J].
BahadoSingh, RO ;
Tan, A ;
Deren, O ;
Hunter, D ;
Copel, J ;
Mahoney, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (04) :824-829
[7]   NORMAL NUCHAL THICKNESS IN THE MIDTRIMESTER INDICATES REDUCED RISK OF DOWN-SYNDROME IN PREGNANCIES WITH ABNORMAL TRIPLE-SCREEN RESULTS [J].
BAHADOSINGH, RO ;
GOLDSTEIN, I ;
UERPAIROJKIT, B ;
COPEL, JA ;
MAHONEY, MJ ;
BAUMGARTEN, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (04) :1106-1110
[8]   Ultrasonographically adjusted midtrimester risk of trisomy 21 and significant chromosomal defects in advanced maternal age [J].
BahadoSingh, RO ;
Deren, O ;
Tan, A ;
DAncona, RL ;
Hunter, D ;
Copel, JA ;
Mahoney, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1563-1568
[9]  
BAHADOSINGH RO, 1998, NEW SCREENING PROTOC, P779
[10]   SONOGRAPHIC SCORING INDEX FOR PRENATAL DETECTION OF CHROMOSOMAL-ABNORMALITIES [J].
BENACERRAF, BR ;
NEUBERG, D ;
BROMLEY, B ;
FRIGOLETTO, FD .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (09) :449-458