Three-Year Outcome of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the MISSION! Intervention Study)

被引:41
作者
Atary, Jael Z. [1 ]
van der Hoeven, Bas L. [1 ]
Liem, Su San [1 ]
Jukema, J. Wouter [1 ]
van der Bom, Johanna G. [2 ]
Atsma, Douwe E. [1 ]
Bootsma, Marianne [1 ]
Zeppenfeld, Katja [1 ]
van der Wall, Ernst E. [1 ]
Schalij, Martin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; UNCOATED STENTS; METAANALYSIS; REDEFINITION; CARDIOLOGY; THERAPY; COLLEGE; BENEFIT; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.02.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) to those of bare-metal stents (BMS) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, outcomes were assessed in 310 patients (mean age age 59 +/- 11 years, 78% men) included in the randomized MISSION! Intervention Study: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction after a median follow-up period of 38 months. All patients were treated with aspirin (lifelong) and clopidogrel for 1 year after stent implantation. Except for a significant difference between reference vessel diameters (SES 2.76 mm vs BMS 2.92 mm, p = 0.02), there were no significant differences in baseline and angiographic characteristics between the treatment groups (158 SES, 152 BMS). A significant difference between SES and BMS patients for all revascularization end points was found after the first year of follow-up. However, at 3 years of follow-up, although there was still a trend toward better clinical outcomes in SES-treated patients, differences were no longer significant (death 4.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.41; target vessel related myocardial infarction 2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.32; target vessel revascularization 8.9% vs 15.8%, p = 0.06), target lesion revascularization 6.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.06; and target vessel failure 12.0% vs 19.7%, p = 0.06). Three cases of very late (definite) stent thrombosis were observed in the SES group (1.9%) versus none in the BMS group (p = 0.14). In conclusion, the significant SES benefit (compared to BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions at 1-year follow-up in terms of target vessel revascularizations decreased to some extent because of more similar target vessel revascularization rates during the 2 subsequent years. Rates of death and nonfatal recurrent MI remained comparable. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2010;106:4-12)
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 12
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Myocardial infarction redefined -: A consensus Document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction [J].
Alpert, JS ;
Antman, E ;
Apple, F ;
Armstrong, PW ;
Bassand, JP ;
de Luna, AB ;
Beller, G ;
Breithardt, G ;
Chaitman, BR ;
Clemmensen, P ;
Falk, E ;
Fishbein, MC ;
Galvani, M ;
Garson, A ;
Grines, C ;
Hamm, C ;
Jaffe, A ;
Katus, H ;
Kjekshus, J ;
Klein, W ;
Klootwijk, P ;
Lenfant, C ;
Levy, D ;
Levy, RI ;
Luepker, R ;
Marcus, F ;
Näslund, U ;
Ohman, M ;
Pahlm, O ;
Poole-Wilson, P ;
Popp, R ;
Alto, P ;
Pyörälä, K ;
Ravkilde, J ;
Rehnquist, N ;
Roberts, W ;
Roberts, R ;
Roelandt, J ;
Rydén, L ;
Sans, S ;
Simoons, ML ;
Thygesen, K ;
Tunstall-Pedoe, H ;
Underwood, R ;
Uretsky, BF ;
Van de Werf, F ;
Voipio-Pulkki, LM ;
Wagner, G ;
Wallentin, L ;
Wijns, W .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) :959-969
[2]   European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: How to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials [J].
Apple, FS ;
Wu, AHB ;
Jaffe, AS .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (06) :981-986
[3]   3-Year Comparison of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents [J].
Applegate, Robert J. ;
Sacrinty, Matthew T. ;
Kutcher, Michael A. ;
Santos, Renato M. ;
Gandhi, Sanjay K. ;
Little, William C. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (03) :231-239
[4]   Invasive therapy along with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and intracoronary stents improves survival in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A meta-analysis and review of the literature [J].
Bavry, AA ;
Kumbhani, DJ ;
Quiroz, R ;
Ramchandani, SR ;
Kenchaiah, S ;
Antman, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (07) :830-835
[5]   Clinical end points in coronary stent trials - A case for standardized definitions [J].
Cutlip, Donald E. ;
Windecker, Stephan ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Boam, Ashley ;
Cohen, David J. ;
van Es, Gerrit-Anne ;
Steg, P. Gabriel ;
Morel, Marie-angele ;
Mauri, Laura ;
Vranckx, Pascal ;
McFadden, Eugene ;
Lansky, Alexandra ;
Hamon, Martial ;
Krucoff, Mitchell W. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (17) :2344-2351
[6]   Comparison of three-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries) [J].
Daemen, Joost ;
Tanimoto, Shuzou ;
Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. ;
Kukreja, Neville ;
van de Sande, Meike ;
Sianos, Georgios ;
de Jaegere, Peter P. T. ;
van Domburg, Ron T. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (08) :1027-1032
[7]   RETRACTED: Long-Term Outcome of Drug-Eluting Stents Compared With Bare Metal Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Results of the Paclitaxel- or Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Stent in Primary Angioplasty (PASEO) Randomized Trial (Retracted article. See vol. 121, pg. E228, 2010) [J].
Di Lorenzo, Emilio ;
Sauro, Rosario ;
Varricchio, Attilio ;
Carbone, Giannignazio ;
Cortese, Giuliana ;
Capasso, Michele ;
Lanzillo, Tonino ;
Manganelli, Fiore ;
Mariello, Ciro ;
Siano, Francesco ;
Pagliuca, Maria Rosaria ;
Stanco, Giovanni ;
Rosato, Giuseppe ;
De Luca, Giuseppe .
CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (11) :964-972
[8]   Meta-analysis of randomized trials on drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction [J].
Kastrati, Adnan ;
Dibra, Alban ;
Spaulding, Christian ;
Laarman, Gerrit J. ;
Menichelli, Maurizio ;
Valgimigli, Marco ;
Di Lorenzo, Emilio ;
Kaiser, Christoph ;
Tierala, Ilkka ;
Mehilli, Julinda ;
Seyfarth, Melchior ;
Varenne, Olivier ;
Dirksen, Maurits T. ;
Percoco, Gianfranco ;
Varricchio, Attilio ;
Pittl, Undine ;
Syvanne, Mikko ;
Suttorp, Maarten J. ;
Violini, Roberto ;
Schoemig, Albert .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (22) :2706-2713
[9]   Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials [J].
Keeley, EC ;
Boura, JA ;
Grines, CL .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) :13-20
[10]   Paclitaxel-eluting versus uncoated stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention [J].
Laarman, Gerrit J. ;
Suttorp, Maarten J. ;
Dirksen, Maurits T. ;
van Heerebeek, Loek ;
Kiemeneij, Ferdinand ;
Slagboom, Ton ;
van der Wieken, L. Ron ;
Tijssen, Jan G. P. ;
Rensing, Benno J. ;
Patterson, Mark .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (11) :1105-1113