A primate dictionary? Decoding the function and meaning of another species' vocalizations

被引:25
作者
Hauser, MD
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Neurosci Program, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15516709cog2403_5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Decoding the function and meaning of a foreign culture's sounds and gestures is a notoriously difficult problem. It is even more challenging when we think about the sounds and gestures of nonhuman animals. This essay provides a review of what is currently known about the informational content and function of primate vocalizations, emphasizing the problems underlying the construction of a primate "dictionary." In contrast to the Oxford English Dictionary, this dictionary provides entries to emotional expressions as well as potentially referential expressions. It therefore represents a guide to what animals do with their vocalizations, as well as how they are represented by signalers and perceivers. I begin by a discussion of the unit problem, of how on acoustic space is carved up into functionally significant components leading to a species-specific repertoire or lexicon of sorts. This section shows how little we know about the units of organization within animal vocal repertoires, and how such lock of information constrains our ability to tackle the problem of syntactic structure. In Section III, I review research on the production and perception of vocal signals that appear to be functionally referential. This work shows that several nonhuman primates produce vocalizations that shore some of the key properties of reference, but certainly not all; the components that are missing raises questions about their role as precursors to human words. In Section IV, I explore the social uses of vocalizations, assessing whether the signal contains sufficient information for listeners to judge a caller's credibility; ultimately, caller credibility determines how receivers select on appropriate response. Results show that individuals can use calls to assess whether someone is reliable or unreliable, and that such attributes ore associated with individuals and particular contexts. I conclude by synthesizing the issues presented and then raise some directions for future conceptual and methodological progress.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 475
页数:31
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]  
Abler William, 1997, Evolutionary Theory and Review, V11, P237
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1975, MIND LANGUAGE REALIT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The evolution of communication
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Approaches to the evolution of language
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, 'Gavagai!' or the Future History of the Animal Language Controversy
[7]   Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants [J].
Aslin, RN ;
Saffran, JR ;
Newport, EL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (04) :321-324
[8]  
BALDWIN D, 1995, JOINT ATTENTION ITS, P133
[9]  
BICKERTON D, 1990, SPECIES LANGUAGE
[10]   Capacities underlying word learning [J].
Bloom, P ;
Markson, L .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (02) :67-73