When have mammographic calcifications been adequately sampled at needle core biopsy?

被引:28
作者
Bagnall, MJC [1 ]
Evans, AJ [1 ]
Wilson, ARM [1 ]
Burrell, H [1 ]
Pinder, SE [1 ]
Ellis, IO [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hosp Nottingham, Breast Screening Training Ctr, Nottingham, England
关键词
biopsy; breast; mammography;
D O I
10.1053/crad.1999.0483
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIMS: To determine if the number of flecks of calcification retrieved at stereotaxic core needle biopsy or the number of core samples obtained containing calcification are related to biopsy sensitivity, and to determine how many calcifications or cores containing calcification the radiologist should aim to retrieve when sampling mammographic microcalcification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of core specimen radiographs from 57 consecutive patients who had stereotaxic core needle biopsies of impalpable malignant microcalcifications without an associated mammographic mass. The total number of calcifications retrieved and the numbers of cores containing calcification were correlated with findings at core and surgical histology, RESULTS: Increasing retrieval of calcification elements visible on specimen radiography was associated with increasing sensitivity of the biopsy. Five or more flecks of calcium gave an absolute sensitivity of 100%. Increasing numbers of core samples obtained containing radiographically demonstrable calcification was also associated with increasing sensitivity. Three or more cores containing calcium resulted in a 100% absolute sensitivity for malignancy. CONCLUSION: To ensure adequate sampling of calcification at core biopsy, an optimum of either three or more cores containing calcium or five or more flecks of calcium in total is required. Achieving this target ensures a high pre-operative diagnosis rate for malignant microcalcifications. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 553
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: Effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy [J].
Brenner, RJ ;
Fajardo, L ;
Fisher, PR ;
Dershaw, DD ;
Evans, WP ;
Bassett, L ;
Feig, S ;
Mendelson, E ;
Jackson, V ;
Margolin, FR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (02) :341-346
[2]   Changing to core biopsy in an NHS breast screening unit [J].
Britton, PD ;
Flower, CDR ;
Freeman, AH ;
Sinnatamby, R ;
Warren, R ;
Goddard, MJ ;
Wight, DGD ;
Bobrow, L .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (10) :764-767
[3]   Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: Improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy [J].
Burbank, F .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (03) :843-847
[4]   Histologic-radiologic correlation of mammographically detected microcalcification in stereotactic core biopsies [J].
Dahlstrom, JE ;
Sutton, S ;
Jain, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 22 (02) :256-259
[5]   Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: Results of rebiopsy [J].
Dershaw, DD ;
Morris, EA ;
Liberman, L ;
Abramson, AF .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (02) :323-325
[6]  
DEWOLF C, 1999, MAMMOGRAPHY SCREEINI
[7]   DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN-SITU OF THE BREAST - CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC AND PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS [J].
EVANS, A ;
PINDER, S ;
WILSON, R ;
SIBBERING, M ;
POLLER, D ;
ELSTON, C ;
ELLIS, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (06) :1307-1311
[8]   EXTENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND MAMMOGRAPHIC HISTOLOGICAL CORRELATIONS OF BREAST DUCTAL CARCINOMA INSITU [J].
HOLLAND, R ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
VERBEEK, ALM ;
MRAVUNAC, M ;
STEKHOVEN, JHS .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8688) :519-522
[9]   Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: Comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy techniques [J].
Jackman, RJ ;
Marzoni, FA ;
Nowels, KW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (05) :1325-1330
[10]   STEREOTAXIC LARGE-CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY OF 450 NONPALPABLE BREAST-LESIONS WITH SURGICAL CORRELATION IN LESIONS WITH CANCER OR ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA [J].
JACKMAN, RJ ;
NOWELS, KW ;
SHEPARD, MJ ;
FINKELSTEIN, SI ;
MARZONI, FA .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (01) :91-95