The AutoPap system for primary screening in cervical cytology - Comparing the results of a prospective, intended-use study with routine manual practice

被引:98
作者
Wilbur, DC
Prey, MU
Miller, WM
Pawlick, GF
Colgan, TJ
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] NeoPath Inc, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
[3] SmithKline Beecham Clin Labs Inc, St Louis, MO USA
[4] SmithKline Beecham Clin Labs Inc, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] So Calif Permanente Med Grp, Reg Labs, Berkeley, CA USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] MDS Labs, Etobicoke, ON, Canada
关键词
cervical smears; cervix neoplasms; mass screening; AutoPap;
D O I
10.1159/000331549
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the AutoPap System in detecting abnormal and normal cervical smears when used in a primary screening/quality control mode, as compared with currently established laboratory practices. STUDY DESIGN: Slides were obtained prospectively and were initially processed in the routine fashion with cytotechnologist screening followed by 10% random quality control rescreening. Slides were then processed on the AutoPap System and allocated into the following groups: (1) approximately 25% of the lowest-ranking slides were placed In the laboratory's archives as within normal limits; (2) the remaining approximately 75% of slices were subjected to manual screening. Approximately 15% of the highest-ranking slides in this group underwent quality control rescreening. For each slide needing manual screening, the cytotechnologist was supplied with a report giving the ranking score of that slide. All discrepant slides for either adequacy diagnosis were subjected to a truth-determination process. The results obtained from the two arms of the protocol were then compared. RESULTS: The AutoPap System-assisted arm gffhe study was superior to the current practice arm for the identification of abnormal slides at the level of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and above (ASCUS+), low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) anti higher LSIL+. AutoPap System-assisted practice tons equivalent to current practice for the identification of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited by slides. All results showed statistical significance. In addition, AutoPap System-assisted practice in the study indicated improved specificity of diagnosis. CONCLUSION: AutoPap System-assisted practice shows superior sensitivity and specificity when compared to current practice. Its clinical use as a primary screening device should improve the overall practice of cervical cytology as well as provide potential enhancement in overall laboratory productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 220
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, STAT SCI
[2]  
BARTELS WH, 1997, ACTA CYTOL, V41, P6
[3]  
Bedrossian C, 1997, ACTA CYTOL, V41, P924
[4]  
CHRISTOPHERSON WM, 1976, CANCER, V38, P1357, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197609)38:3<1357::AID-CNCR2820380340>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-A
[6]   ESTIMATION OF SCREENING ERROR RATE FROM OBSERVED DETECTION RATES IN REPEATED CERVICAL CYTOLOGY [J].
COPPLESON, LW ;
BROWN, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1974, 119 (07) :953-958
[7]  
Fleiss JL, 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P
[8]  
Lee James S. J., 1997, Pathology Research and Practice, V193, P436
[9]  
PATTEN SF, IN PRESS CANC CYTOPA
[10]  
1989, MMWR, V38, P650