Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: A quantitative analysis

被引:130
作者
Schull, MJ
Lazier, K
Vermeulen, M
Mawhinney, S
Morrison, LJ
机构
[1] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Emergency Serv, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Toronto Emergency Med Serv, Prehosp Res Grp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Div Emergency Med, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Adm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Sunnybrook & Womens Coll, Hlth Sci Ctr, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mem.2003.23
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We determine the relationship between physician, nursing, and patient factors on emergency department use of ambulance diversion. Methods: Data were collected at 1 ED in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on the duration of ambulance diversion during consecutive 8-hour intervals from January to December 1999 (intervals=1,095). By using time series methods, the association between ambulance diversion and nurse hours, physician on duty, and boarded patients was determined. Covariates included patient volume, assessment time, and boarding time. Results: A total of 37,999 patients were treated in the ED over the study period (2% major trauma, 16% ambulance arrivals, and 22% admitted). Nurse hours per interval averaged 60. A mean of 3.2 admitted patients were boarded in the ED each interval. For admitted patients, the time from registration to admission order and from admission order to ED departure averaged 5.2 and 3.5 hours, respectively. There was no ambulance diversion during 170 (15.5%) intervals, whereas 17 (1.5%) intervals were continuously on diversion. In time series analyses, ambulance diversion increased with the number of admitted patients boarded in the ED (6.2 minutes per patient; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 2.6 to 9.8 minutes), the number admitted per interval (4.6 minutes per patient; 95% Cl 0.1 to 9.1 minutes), assessment time (9.9 minutes per hour; 95% Cl 3.3 to 16.5 minutes), and boarding time (11.3 minutes per hour; 95% Cl 5.6 to 17.0 minutes). Thirteen of 15 emergency physicians were not associated with ambulance diversion, 1 was associated with reduced use (-36.3 minutes; 95% Cl -65.2 to -7.5 minutes), and 1 was associated with increased use (47.6 minutes; 95% Cl 4.5 to 90.6 minutes). ED nurse hours were not associated with diversion. Ambulance-delivered patient volume was associated with diversion (5.2 minutes per patient; 95% Cl 2.7 to 7.8 minutes), but walk-in patients and patients with major trauma were not. Conclusion: Admitted patients in the ED are important determinants of ambulance diversion, whereas nurse hours and most emergency physicians are not. Reducing the volume of walk-in patients is unlikely to lessen the use of diversion.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 476
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS AND CROWDING IN UNITED-STATES TEACHING HOSPITALS [J].
ANDRULIS, DP ;
KELLERMANN, A ;
HINTZ, EA ;
HACKMAN, BB ;
WESLOWSKI, VB .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (09) :980-986
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, ANN EMERG MED, V19, P336
[3]  
*AUD COMM AC HOSP, 2001, ACC EM REV NAT FIND
[4]   Dynamics of bed use in accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model [J].
Bagust, A ;
Place, M ;
Posnett, JW .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7203) :155-158
[5]   OLD-PEOPLE IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM - AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USE AND CARE [J].
BAUM, SA ;
RUBENSTEIN, LZ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1987, 35 (05) :398-404
[6]  
BELAND F, 2001, N8902 U MONTR FAC ME, P1
[7]   Effects of trauma cases on the care of patients who have chest pain in an emergency department [J].
Boutros, F ;
Redelmeier, DA .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2000, 48 (04) :649-653
[8]  
*CAN HLTH SERV RES, 2000, MYTH MOR MON WOULD P
[9]  
CHAN B, 2001, ATLAS EMERGENCY DEP
[10]   Frequent overcrowding in US emergency departments [J].
Derlet, RW ;
Richards, JR ;
Kravitz, RL .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (02) :151-155