Estimation of landscape potential for construction of surface-flow wetlands for wastewater treatment in Estonia

被引:17
作者
Lesta, Merje
Mauring, Tonu
Mander, Uelo
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Inst Geog, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia
[2] Ctr Ecol Engn, EE-51014 Tartu, Estonia
关键词
constructed wetlands center dot; landscape analysis; landscape map; orthophotos; soil map; suitability analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-005-0278-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main aim of this article is to demonstrate a method of complex landscape analysis in order to estimate the landscape suitability for the construction of surface-flow wetlands (SFW) for wastewater treatment. This is a multilevel suitability analysis from a more general regional (landscape) assessment based on a map of landscape types (1:100,000) toward a detailed analysis based on aerial orthophotos and detailed soil maps (1:10,000). The assessment scheme consists of landscape classification according to the physical-chemical properties of landscape factors (soil conditions, landforms, hydrogeology, expert decisions concerning landscape values, and suitability analysis). The partial suitability values of SFWs are derived by summarizing expert values for landscape factors (each ranging from -1 to +1). By multiplying the summarized partial suitability values with nature protection values (ranging from 0 to 1), we obtain the final suitability value for each landscape type. Any kind of nature protection area has been considered nonsuitable and excluded at regional-level analysis. The results of the regional analysis demonstrate that suitability is distributed relatively equally over the study area. The high suitability potential (classified as "very suitable") is relatively evenly distributed in lowland regions throughout the country. The share of "very suitable" and "suitable" areas in different counties varies from 5 to 23% and 7 to 49%, respectively. The detailed analysis based on aerial orthophotos showed that areas suitable for SFWs can also be found within the areas determined to be unsuitable based on the less detailed map of landscape types, whereas differences are much greater between settlements chosen for the detailed suitability analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 313
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   A review of statistical methods for the evaluation of aquatic habitat suitability for instream flow assessment [J].
Ahmadi-Nedushan, Behrouz ;
St-Hilaire, Andre ;
Berube, Michel ;
Robichaud, Elaine ;
Thiemonge, Nathalie ;
Bobee, Bernard .
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2006, 22 (05) :503-523
[2]  
ALNGE C, 1995, GIS FORSCHUNG PRAXIS, P277
[3]  
AROLD I, 2001, LANDSCAPE TYPES ESTO
[4]  
Astover Alar, 2006, Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, V52, P223, DOI 10.1080/03650340600638883
[5]   Modelling optimum sites for locating reservoirs in tropical environments [J].
Baban, SMJ ;
Wan-Yusof, K .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2003, 17 (01) :1-17
[6]   A conceptual model for defining and assessing land management units using a fuzzy modeling approach in GIS environment [J].
Baja, S ;
Chapman, DM ;
Dragovich, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 29 (05) :647-661
[7]   Landscape classification in Saxony (Germany) - a tool for holistic regional planning [J].
Bastian, O .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2000, 50 (1-3) :145-155
[8]  
BASTIAN O, 1999, ANAL OKOLOGISCHE BEW, V2, P564
[9]   The need to define hydrologic equivalence at the landscape scale for freshwater wetland mitigation [J].
Bedford, BL .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (01) :57-68
[10]  
BIRKEN M, 1996, INTELLIGENT GIS