Beyond change management: A multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change

被引:238
作者
Herold, David M. [1 ]
Fedor, Donald B.
Caldwell, Steven D.
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Management, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Sch Business Adm & Econ, Upstate, SC 29208 USA
关键词
change; context; self-efficacy; commitment;
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.942
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The extent to which attitudes toward organizational changes may be affected by contextual (other changes going on) and personal (self-efficacy) factors was investigated with a multilevel design involving 25 different changes. Even after aspects of the change itself were controlled, the interaction between the context and the individual difference explained significant variance in attitudes toward those specific changes. The positive relationship between self-efficacy and commitment to the change was stronger as the amount of simultaneous and overlapping change in the surroundings increased. The implications for research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 951
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Armenakis AA, 1999, J MANAGE, V25, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(99)00004-5
[2]  
Armenakis AA, 1993, HUM RELAT, V46, P1
[3]   CONTENT, CAUSES, AND CONSEQUENCES OF JOB INSECURITY - A THEORY-BASED MEASURE AND SUBSTANTIVE TEST [J].
ASHFORD, SJ ;
LEE, C ;
BOBKO, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 32 (04) :803-829
[5]  
BECKER TE, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P232, DOI 10.5465/256481
[6]   Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance [J].
Becker, TE ;
Billings, RS ;
Eveleth, DM ;
Gilbert, NL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (02) :464-482
[7]  
BEER M, 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, V68, P158
[8]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P349, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[9]   An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J].
Brockner, J ;
Wiesenfeld, BM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :189-208
[10]   Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability [J].
Brockner, J .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :58-76