A computer adaptive testing simulation applied to the FIM instrument motor component

被引:24
作者
Dijkers, MP [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2003年 / 84卷 / 03期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); questionnaires; rehabilitation; reproducibility of results; spinal cord injuries;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2003.50006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether computer adaptive testing (CAT) can be used to decrease the number of FIM(TM) instrument motor component items administered in assessing persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: For a CAT simulation, a 3-step algorithm was use to select 6 FIM items for each individual; items were selected according to the subject's motor ability as estimated by 2 initial items. Separate estimates of motor ability for admission, discharge, and follow-up data (plus combined time points) derived from 6 items were compared statistically with estimates derived from 14 items (walking and wheelchair mobility were split). Setting: Records from the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS). Participants: Patients served by the SCIMS, for whom complete motor FIM information was available for rehabilitation admission (N=5969), discharge (N=5964), or follow-up at a first or later anniversary (N=5176). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Similarity of mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and Rasch reliability and separation of persons and items based on 6 and 13 items; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for parallel estimates. Results: Calibrations for FIM items and FIM steps differed for the 3 time points, but showed sufficient agreement (ICC, >.90) that combined calibration was feasible. Means and other distribution characteristics differed minimally between the 6- and 13-item estimates. The person and item separations and reliabilities were somewhat lower and the mean measurement errors somewhat higher for the 6-item estimates, but only marginally so. ICCs between 6- and 13-item estimates were .95 or higher. Conclusion: CAT can be used to reduce data collection time; the level of precision of estimates is minimally less than that provided by traditional assessment approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 393
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Andiel C., 1995, CAN J REHABIL, V9, P17
  • [2] Andrich D, 1988, RASCH MODELS MEASURE, V68
  • [3] Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients -: The Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients (PASS)
    Benaim, C
    Pérennou, DA
    Villy, J
    Rousseaux, M
    Pelissier, JY
    [J]. STROKE, 1999, 30 (09) : 1862 - 1868
  • [4] Bergstrom BA, 1999, INNOVATIONS IN COMPUTERIZED ASSESSMENT, P67
  • [5] Bond TG., 2007, Applying the Rasch Model Fundamental: Measurement in the Human Sciences
  • [6] Chang W C, 1997, J Outcome Meas, V1, P192
  • [7] RASCH ANALYSIS FOR OUTCOMES MEASURES - SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    CHANG, WC
    CHAN, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (10): : 934 - 939
  • [8] Short versions of the telephone motor functional independence measure for use with persons with spinal cord injury
    Dijkers, MPJM
    Yavuzer, G
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1999, 80 (11): : 1477 - 1484
  • [9] Drasgow F., 1999, Innovations in computerized assessment
  • [10] Green BF, 1991, PSYCHOL MARKETING, V8, P243, DOI DOI 10.1002/MAR.4220080403