Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis - An evaluation of postoperative factors

被引:83
作者
Ball, CG
Kortbeek, JB
Kirkpatrick, AW
Mitchell, P
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Peter Lougheed Ctr, Dept Surg, Calgary, AB T1Y 6J4, Canada
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2004年 / 18卷 / 06期
关键词
laparoscopic appendectomy; acute appendicitis; complicated appendicitis;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is controversial. Outcomes were compared between patients who had complicated appendicitis and those who had uncomplicated appendicitis. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 304) who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were studied. Patients undergoing open appendectomies also were compared ad hoe. Analgesia use, length of hospital stay, return to activity, and complication rates for the complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis subgroups were analyzed. Results: Complete data were available for 243 patients (80%). There were no statistical differences in characteristics between the two groups. The operating times, lengths of hospital stay, return to activity times, complication rates, and analgesia requirements, both in the hospital and after discharge, were equivalent. A greater number of complicated cases required open conversion. Considering those with complicated appendicitis, the open group had a significantly longer mean hospital stay and a higher complication rate than those treated with laparoscopic appendectomy. Conclusions: The minimally invasive laparoscopic technique is safe and efficacious. It should be the initial procedure of choice for most cases of complicated appendicitis.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 973
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Al-Omran M, 2003, CAN J SURG, V46, P263
[2]  
Brosseuk DT, 1999, CAN J SURG, V42, P138
[3]   A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy [J].
Chung, RS ;
Rowland, DY ;
Li, P ;
Diaz, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :250-256
[4]  
Frazee RC, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P509
[5]   Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy [J].
Garbutt, JM ;
Soper, NJ ;
Shannon, WD ;
Botero, A ;
Littenberg, B .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) :17-26
[6]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis [J].
Golub, R ;
Siddiqui, F ;
Pohl, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (05) :545-553
[7]   Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis [J].
Johnson, AB ;
Peetz, ME .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (07) :940-943
[8]  
Khalili TM, 1999, AM SURGEON, V65, P965
[9]   Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications [J].
Klingler, A ;
Henle, KP ;
Beller, S ;
Rechner, J ;
Zerz, A ;
Wetscher, GJ ;
Szinicz, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (03) :232-235
[10]   A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses [J].
Long, KH ;
Bannon, MP ;
Zietlow, SP ;
Helgeson, ER ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Smith, CD ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Baerga-Verala, Y ;
Sarr, MG .
SURGERY, 2001, 129 (04) :390-400