Glaucoma's impact on quality of life and its relation to clinical indicators - A pilot study

被引:139
作者
Sherwood, MB
Garcia-Siekavizza, A
Meltzer, MI
Hebert, A
Burns, AF
McGorray, S
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] CDC, Natl Ctr Infect Dis, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Anthropol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Stat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(98)93043-3
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to compare the quality of life (Q of L) of patients with glaucoma and control subjects and to determine the relationships between Q of L and demographic and clinical variables in patients with glaucoma. Design: The study design was a stratified cross-sectional study. Participants: A gender-, race-, and age-stratified cross-sectional sample of patients with glaucoma (n = 56) and control subjects (n = 54) was obtained. Additional patients (n = 12) were included to examine the relationships between glaucoma, its therapy, and Q of L. Intervention: The Medical Outcomes Study short form (MOS-20), the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS), and questions related to glaucoma and side effects of treatment were administered. Descriptive statistics characterized demographic variables and MOS and ADVS scales. Group differences were evaluated using chi-square, Fisher's and Ordinal Exact, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and two-sample t tests. Spearman rank correlations were obtained between MOS-ADVS scores and clinical and demographic variables. Regression was used for multivariate analysis. Main Outcome Measures: The MOS scores, ADVS scores, visual acuity, visual fields, and demographic variables were measured. Results: Patients scored significantly lower than did the control subjects in all MOS-20 categories except pain. Differences were physical (-20%), role (-43%), mental health (-10%), general health (-22%), and social (-9%). The only category that was not statistically significant was that of pain (P = 0.075). In the glaucoma subgroup, there were differences between whites and nonwhites in MOS subscales physical, role, social, pain, and health, and ADVS near vision, In patients, current medications and previous surgeries correlated with ADVS subscales night vision, near vision, and glare; visual acuity and fields correlated with MOS subscales physical, role and health, and all ADVS subscales, A multiple regression model including visual acuity and fields, urban residence, and female gender explained 61% of the variability in ADVS overall score. Conclusions: The Q-of-L perception differed between patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Increasing field loss, decreased visual acuity, and complexity of therapy correlated with patients' reduction in activities of daily vision.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 566
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BERNTHPETERSEN P, 1990, NIH PUBLICATION, P13
[2]   VISION CHANGE AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN THE ELDERLY - RESPONSE TO CATARACT-SURGERY AND TREATMENT OF OTHER CHRONIC OCULAR CONDITIONS [J].
BRENNER, MH ;
CURBOW, B ;
JAVITT, JC ;
LEGRO, MW ;
SOMMER, A .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (05) :680-685
[3]  
BROWN RH, 1994, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V15, P299
[4]   QUALITY OF LIFE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS ON DIFFERENT ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENTS - RATIONALE FOR METHODS EMPLOYED IN A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BULPITT, CJ ;
FLETCHER, AE .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 7 :S137-S145
[5]  
COWAN CL, 1988, J NATL MED ASSOC, V80, P715
[6]  
COWAN CL, 1988, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V106, P738
[7]   OUTCOMES OF CATARACT-SURGERY - IMPROVEMENT IN VISUAL-ACUITY AND SUBJECTIVE VISUAL FUNCTION AFTER SURGERY IN THE 1ST, 2ND, AND BOTH EYES [J].
JAVITT, JC ;
BRENNER, MH ;
CURBOW, B ;
LEGRO, MW ;
STREET, DA .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (05) :686-691
[8]  
KLEIN R, 1990, NIH PUBLICATION, P23
[9]   The importance of ''quality of care'' [J].
Lee, P ;
Minckler, D .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (04) :549-550
[10]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA - A REVIEW [J].
LESKE, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1983, 118 (02) :166-191