The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents. Part II. Practical examples of the use of Bayesian networks

被引：16

作者：

Biedermann, A ^{[1
]}

Taroni, F

Delemont, O

Semadeni, C

Davison, AC

机构：

[1] Univ Lausanne, Ecole Sci Criminelles, Inst Police Sci, BCH, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

[2] Fed Off Police, CH-3003 Bern, Switzerland

[3] Univ Lausanne, Inst Med Legale, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland

[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Math Inst, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

来源：

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2005年 / 147卷 / 01期

关键词：

Bayesian network; evidence evaluation; forensic fire cause investigation;

D O I：

10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.04.015

中图分类号：

DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];

学科分类号：

0301 ; 10 ;

摘要：

This paper extends a previous discussion of the use of Bayesian networks for evaluating evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents. Bayesian networks are proposed for two casework examples and the practical implications studied in detail. Such networks were found to provide precious support in addressing some of the wide range of issues that affect the coherent evaluation of evidence. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：59 / 69

页数：11

共 8 条

[1] The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents (Part 1): an approach using Bayesian networks [J].

Biedermann, A ;

Taroni, F ;

Delemont, O ;

Semadeni, C ;

Davison, AC .

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 147 (01) :49-57

[2]

CHANSON B, 2000, P 2 EUR AC FOR SCI M

[3]

Kahnemann D., 1982, JUDGEMENT UNCERTAINT

[4] Building large-scale Bayesian networks [J].

Neil, M ;

Fenton, N ;

Nielsen, L .

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2000, 15 (03) :257-284

[5]

*NFPA, 2001, 921 NFPA

[6]

PAPILLOUD J, 1997, P 1 EUR M FOR SCI 17

[7]

Robertson B, 1995, INTERPRETING EVIDENC

[8]

Schum D., 1994, EVIDENTIAL FDN PROBA

← 1 →