Modelling the adoption of industrial cogeneration in Japan using manufacturing plant survey data

被引:12
作者
Bonilla, D
Akisawa, A
Kashiwagi, T
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Dept Mech Syst Engn, Tokyo 1848588, Japan
[2] Tokyo Univ Agr & Technol, Bioapplicat & Syst Engn Dept, Tokyo 1848588, Japan
关键词
cogeneration; adoption survey;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00136-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electric power deregulation in Japan opens opportunity for further penetration of on-site generation (cogeneration) otherwise known as distributed generation. In the paper the authors present a survey on Japanese industrial plants to fill existing gaps for the assessment of modern cogeneration (combined heat and power. CHP). The objective of the paper is to empirically examine CHP systems based on cross-sectional binary models; second to review diffusion trends of CHP by system vintage during the 1980-2000 period in the manufacturing sector. The econometric results point that the probabilities of embracing this technology increase. in declining importance, with on-site power consumption. and steam demand. operational hours as well as with payback period, purchased power. For example the survey shows that the CHP is used for the purpose of exporting power rather than meeting the plant's own consumption. Some of our results are in line with those of Dismukes and Kleit (Resource Energy Econ. 21 (1999) 153) as well with Rose and Macdonald (Energy J. 12(12) (1991) 47). We also find that a unit increase in satisfaction with CHP swill lead to a 54% in CHP capacity. We find significant evidence on the cost effectiveness of CHP under conservative assumptions. Regarding the influence of satisfaction and performance indicators for the several plants. the survey threw some unexpected evidence on the nature of CHP. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 910
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BONILLA D, 2001, SUMM STUD EN EFF IND
[2]   Investment in energy efficiency: Do the characteristics of firms matter? [J].
DeCanio, SJ ;
Watkins, WE .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1998, 80 (01) :95-107
[3]   Cogeneration and electric power industry restructuring [J].
Dismukes, DE ;
Kleit, AN .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (02) :153-166
[4]  
DUNSKY P, 2000, 1920 1995 BEYOND TRE, V6, P29
[5]  
*EDMC, 2000, HDB EN EC STAT JAP
[6]   REGULATING INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS - LESSONS OF THE PURPA APPROACH [J].
FOXPENNER, PS .
RESOURCES AND ENERGY, 1990, 12 (01) :117-141
[7]  
Greene WH., 2000, Econ Analysis
[8]  
Jacobsen HK, 2000, ENERGY J, V21, P43
[9]  
Joskow P. L., 1984, Energy Systems and Policy, V8, P1
[10]  
KAARSBERG T, 1999, ACEEE 1999 IND SUMM