Analyses of neuro-otological complications after radiosurgery for acoustic neurinomas

Purpose: To find out the optimum treatment parameters and the proper indications for treatment of acoustic neurinomas, univariate and multivariate actuarial analyses of neuro-otological complications after stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic neurinomas were performed. Methods and Materials: The subjects were 46 patients with acoustic neurinomas who underwent unilateral radiosurgery between June 1990 and June 1994 and were followed up at the University of Tokyo. Age ranged from 13 to 77 years (median, 54 years). Tumor diameter ranged from 0 to 25 mm (mean, 12 mm) at the cerebellopontine angle and from 2 to 15 mm (mean, 8.3 mm) in the internal auditory meatus. Maximum tumor doses ranged from 20 to 40 Gy (mean, 31.4 Gy), and peripheral doses from 12 to 25 Gy (mean, 16.8 GS) One to eight isocenters were used (mean, 3.2). Median follow-up was 39 months. Eight events concerning neurootological complications were chosen, and the potential risk factors for them were analyzed by the actuarial analyses (univariate and multivariate). The events examined include hearing loss, vestibular function loss, facial palsy, and trigeminal nerve dysfunction. In order to point out potential risk factors for neuro-otological complications, univariate analyses were performed using both the Wilcoxon test and the log rank test, and multivariate analyses were performed with the Cox proportional hazards model. Variables nominated as potential risk factors were 1) demographic variables such as patient age and sex, 2) tumor dimensions, 3) treatment variables such as tumor doses and number of isocenters, and 4) pretreatment hearing levels. A variable with significant p-values (p < 0.05) in two or more of the three actuarial analyses (two univariate and one multivariate) was considered a possible risk factor. Results: The possible variables that increase the risk for each event analyzed were: neurofibromatosis type II (NF2) and the number of isocenters for total hearing loss; experience of prior operation, the tumor diameter in the internal auditory meatus, and NF2 for hearing threshold elevation; peripheral tumor dose for vestibular function loss; patient age or midporus transverse tumor diameter (the two variables were correlated), and the number of isocenters for facial palsy; and the number of isocenters for trigeminal neuropathy. Conclusion: NF2 and the tumor diameter were the common risk factors for hearing loss in previous studies and ours. For the 5th/7th nerve dysfunction, the tumor diameter was the common risk factor. The risk of using more isocenters remains controversial. The difference in risk factors for hearing impairment and vestibular function loss suggests different mechanisms for the two. Further studies with larger populations and longer follow-up periods are required in order to draw conclusions on the risk factors in radiosurgery. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.