Is oxidative stress involved in the developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos?

被引:109
作者
Crumpton, TL [1 ]
Seidler, FJ [1 ]
Slotkin, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol & Canc Biol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH | 2000年 / 121卷 / 02期
关键词
chlorpyrifos; differentiation; oxidative stress; PC12; cells;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-3806(00)00045-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The increasing use of chlorpyrifos (CPF) has elicited concern about neurotoxic effects on the fetus and neonate. CPF targets a number of events specific to brain development, over and above the ability of its active metabolite, CPF oxon, to inhibit cholinesterase. We used PC12 cells, a model system which displays many of the neurodevelopmental effects of CPF, in order to examine whether oxidative stress underlies the direct effects of CPF on development. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured with a fluorescent intracellular dye. When PC12 cell suspensions were treated acutely with CPF for 10 min, ROS generation was increased in a concentration-dependent manner; CPF oxon was much less effective than the native compound. CPF also increased the ROS production in response to an acute sodium nitroprusside challenge, indicating sensitization of the cells to other oxidant stressors. Next, PC12 cells were grown in an undifferentiated state in the presence of CPF or CPF oxon for extended time periods, under conditions in which CPF inhibits mitosis, and the cells were then washed and ROS production measured. Neither compound elicited a significant change in ROS production. Finally, differentiation was initiated with nerve growth factor and the cells were exposed continuously to CPF or CPF oxon over a 72 h period; under these conditions, CPF inhibits neurite outgrowth. When the cells were washed and evaluated for ROS production, no significant differences were seen. These results indicate that CPF, but not CPF oxon, has the ability to elicit acute increases in ROS production. However, the effect disappears immediately once CPF exposure is terminated, possibly reflecting cellular defense mechanisms that lessen the impact of oxidant injury. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], FRONT BIOSCI
  • [2] In vitro and in vivo induction of heat shock (stress) protein (Hsp) gene expression by selected pesticides
    Bagchi, D
    Bhattacharya, G
    Stohs, SJ
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 112 (01) : 57 - 68
  • [3] In vitro and in vivo generation of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage and lactate dehydrogenase leakage by selected pesticides
    Bagchi, D
    Bagchi, M
    Hassoun, EA
    Stohs, SJ
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 104 (1-3) : 129 - 140
  • [4] CENTRAL NERVOUS-SYSTEM TRAUMA AND STROKE .1. BIOCHEMICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR OXYGEN RADICAL FORMATION AND LIPID-PEROXIDATION
    BRAUGHLER, JM
    HALL, ED
    [J]. FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1989, 6 (03) : 289 - 301
  • [5] Chlorpyrifos interferes with cell development in rat brain regions
    Campbell, CG
    Seidler, FJ
    Slotkin, TA
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1997, 43 (02) : 179 - 189
  • [6] A ROLE FOR THE NICOTINIC ALPHA-BUNGAROTOXIN RECEPTOR IN NEURITE OUTGROWTH IN PC12 CELLS
    CHAN, J
    QUIK, M
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 56 (02) : 441 - 451
  • [7] Developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos in vivo and in vitro: effects on nuclear transcription factors involved in cell replication and differentiation
    Crumpton, TL
    Seidler, FJ
    Slotkin, TA
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 857 (1-2) : 87 - 98
  • [8] CRUMPTON TL, 1999, TOXICOLOGIST, V48, P253
  • [9] Neonatal chlorpyrifos exposure alters synaptic development and neuronal activity in cholinergic and catecholaminergic pathways
    Dam, K
    Garcia, SJ
    Seidler, FJ
    Slotkin, TA
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 116 (01): : 9 - 20
  • [10] Developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos: delayed targeting of DNA synthesis after repeated administration
    Dam, K
    Seidler, FJ
    Slotkin, TA
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 108 (1-2): : 39 - 45