Bifidobacterium breve M-16V as a Probiotic for Preterm Infants: A Strain-Specific Systematic Review

被引:18
作者
Athalye-Jape, Gayatri [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rao, Shripada [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simmer, Karen [1 ,3 ]
Patole, Sanjay [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] King Edward Mem Hosp, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Dept Neonatal Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Paediat & Child Hlth, Ctr Neonatal Res & Educ, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Bifidobacterium breve; meta-analysis; necrotizing enterocolitis; preterm infants; systematic review; PREVENTING NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; METAANALYSIS; SUPPLEMENTATION; EXPRESSION; SEPSIS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1177/0148607117722749
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Introduction: Bifidobacterium breve M-16V has been used as a probiotic in preterminfants. Probiotic strain-specific data are essential to guide clinical practice. Objective: To assess effects of B breve M-16V in preterm neonates. Design: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of B breve M-16V in preterm infants was conducted. Multiple databases, proceedings of Pediatric Academy Society, and other relevant conferences were searched in September 2016 and on January 5, 2017. Results: Five RCTs (n = 482) and 4 non-RCTs (n = 2496) were included. Of the 5 RCTs, 4 carried high/unclear risk of bias in many domains. Meta-analysis (fixed effects model) of RCTs showed no significant benefits on stage >= 2 necrotizing enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, mortality, and postnatal age at full feeds. Meta-analysis of non-RCTs showed significant benefits on (1) late-onset sepsis-3 studies (n = 2452), odds ratio = 0.56 (95% CI, 0.45-0.71), P < .0001; (2) mortality-2 studies (n = 2319), odds ratio = 0.61 (95% CI, 0.44-0.84), P = .002; and (3) postnatal age at full feeds (days)-2 studies (n = 361), mean difference, -2.42 (95% CI, -2.55 to -2.3), P < .00001. There were no adverse effects from B breve M-16V. On Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation analysis, the overall quality of evidence was deemed very low. Conclusions: Current evidence is limited regarding the potential of B breve M-16V in preterm neonates. Adequately powered, preferably cluster RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 688
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Safety evaluation of probiotic bifidobacteria by analysis of mucin degradation activity and translocation ability
    Abe, Fumiaki
    Muto, Masamichi
    Yaeshima, Tomoko
    Iwatsuki, Keiji
    Aihara, Hiroaki
    Ohashi, Yuji
    Fujisawa, Tomohiko
    [J]. ANAEROBE, 2010, 16 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [2] Probiotics and Time to Achieve Full Enteral Feeding in Human Milk-Fed and Formula-Fed Preterm Infants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aceti, Arianna
    Gori, Davide
    Barone, Giovanni
    Callegari, Maria Luisa
    Fantini, Maria Pia
    Indrio, Flavia
    Maggio, Luca
    Meneghin, Fabio
    Morelli, Lorenzo
    Zuccotti, Gianvincenzo
    Corvaglia, Luigi
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2016, 8 (08)
  • [3] Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aceti, Arianna
    Gori, Davide
    Barone, Giovanni
    Callegari, Maria Luisa
    Di Mauro, Antonio
    Fantini, Maria Pia
    Indrio, Flavia
    Maggio, Luca
    Meneghin, Fabio
    Morelli, Lorenzo
    Zuccotti, Gianvincenzo
    Corvaglia, Luigi
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2015, 41
  • [4] Akiyama K., 1994, Acta Neonatol Jpn, V30, P257
  • [5] Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants
    AlFaleh, Khalid
    Anabrees, Jasim
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (04):
  • [6] [Anonymous], J JAPAN SOC PERINATA
  • [7] [Anonymous], ENEONATAL REV
  • [8] [Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
  • [9] [Anonymous], CRDS GUID UND REV HL
  • [10] Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 as a Probiotic for Preterm Neonates: A Strain-Specific Systematic Review
    Athalye-Jape, Gayatri
    Rao, Shripada
    Patole, Sanjay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2016, 40 (06) : 783 - 794