Measuring outcomes in psychiatry: An inpatient model

被引:10
作者
Davis, DF [1 ]
Fong, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] MEMPHIS UNIV,DEPT COUNSELING EDUC PSYCHOL & RES,MEMPHIS,TN 38152
来源
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT | 1996年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1070-3241(16)30214-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This article describes a system for measuring outcomes recently implemented in the department of psychiatry of Baptist Memorial Hospital, a 78-bed inpatient and day treatment unit that represents one service line of a large, urban teaching hospital in Memphis. In June 1993 Baptist Hospital began a 15-month pilot test of PsychSentinel, a measurement tool developed by researchers in the Department of Community Medicine at the University of Connecticut. The hospital identified the following four primary goals for this pilot project: provide data for internal hospital program evaluation, provide data for external marketing in a managed care environment, satisfy requirements of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations, and generate studies that add to the literature in psychiatry and psychology. Description of measure: PsychSentinel is based on the standardized diagnostic criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). The outcome measure assesses the change in the number of symptoms of psychopathology that occurs between admission and discharge from the hospital. Included in the nonproprietary system are risk adjustment factors, as well as access to a national reference database for comparative analysis purposes. Data collection can be done by trained ancillary staff members, with as much or as little direct physician involvement as desired. The system has proven to be both time effective and cost effective, and it provides important outcome information both at the program level and at the clinician level. Results: After the pilot test, the staff at Baptist Memorial Hospital determined that the system met all initial objectives identified and recently adopted the system as an ongoing measure of quality patient care in the department of psychiatry.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   DO WE REALLY WANT A PROGRAM-EVALUATION STRATEGY BASED SOLELY ON INDIVIDUALIZED GOALS - CRITIQUE OF GOAL ATTAINMENT SCALING [J].
CALSYN, RJ ;
DAVIDSON, WS .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1978, 14 (04) :300-308
[2]  
CIARLO JA, 1981, ASSESSMENT CLIENT PA
[3]   GOAL ATTAINMENT SCALING - CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
CYTRYNBAUM, S ;
GINATH, Y ;
BIRDWELL, J ;
BRANDT, L .
EVALUATION QUARTERLY, 1979, 3 (01) :5-40
[4]  
GROB MC, 1990, PSYCHIAT HOSP, V20, P23
[5]  
GUADAGNOLI E, 1994, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V31, P14
[6]   INDIVIDUALIZED MEASURES OF OUTCOME VERSUS STANDARDIZED RATING-SCALES IN EVALUATION OF IN-HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRIC-TREATMENT - A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY [J].
HANSSON, L ;
BERGLUND, M ;
OHMAN, R .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1987, 75 (03) :275-282
[7]  
MARK H, 1994, ANN M AM PSYCH ASS L
[8]  
MARK H, 1992, ANN M AM HOSP ASS SE
[9]  
MIRIN SM, 1991, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V42, P1007
[10]  
ROYBYRNE P, 1995, PSYCHIATR SERV, V46, P347