Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer

被引:2996
作者
Petrylak, DP
Tangen, CM
Hussain, MHA
Lara, PN,J
Jones, JA
Taplin, ME
Burch, PA
Berry, D
Moinpour, C
Kohli, M
Benson, MC
Small, EJ
Raghavan, D
Crawford, ED
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] SW Oncol Grp, Ctr Stat, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Med Ctr, Worcester, MA USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[9] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[10] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Canc, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[11] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[12] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa041318
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy palliates pain without extending survival in men with progressive androgen-independent prostate cancer. We compared docetaxel plus estramustine with mitoxantrone plus prednisone in men with metastatic, hormone-independent prostate cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned 770 men to one of two treatments, each given in 21-day cycles: 280 mg of estramustine three times daily on days 1 through 5, 60 mg of docetaxel per square meter of body-surface area on day 2, and 60 mg of dexamethasone in three divided doses before docetaxel, or 12 mg of mitoxantrone per square meter on day 1 plus 5 mg of prednisone twice daily. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival, objective response rates, and post-treatment declines of at least 50 percent in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. RESULTS: Of 674 eligible patients, 338 were assigned to receive docetaxel and estramustine and 336 to receive mitoxantrone and prednisone. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the median overall survival was longer in the group given docetaxel and estramustine than in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone (17.5 months vs. 15.6 months, P=0.02 by the log-rank test), and the corresponding hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.97). The median time to progression was 6.3 months in the group given docetaxel and estramustine and 3.2 months in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone (P<0.001 by the log-rank test). PSA declines of at least 50 percent occurred in 50 percent and 27 percent of patients, respectively (P<0.001), and objective tumor responses were observed in 17 percent and 11 percent of patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, respectively (P=0.30). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic fevers (P=0.01), nausea and vomiting (P<0.001), and cardiovascular events (P=0.001) were more common among patients receiving docetaxel and estramustine than among those receiving mitoxantrone and prednisone. Pain relief was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in median survival of nearly two months with docetaxel and estramustine, as compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone, provides support for this approach in men with metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1520
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] MECHANISMS OF ACTION AND CLINICAL USES OF ESTRAMUSTINE
    BENSON, R
    HARTLEYASP, B
    [J]. CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1990, 8 (3-4) : 375 - 380
  • [2] Phase III study of mitoxantrone plus low dose prednisone versus low dose prednisone alone in patients with asymptomatic hormone refractory prostate cancer
    Berry, W
    Dakhil, S
    Modiano, M
    Gregurich, M
    Asmar, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (06) : 2439 - 2443
  • [3] Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: Recommendations from the prostate-specific antigen working group
    Bubley, GJ
    Carducci, M
    Dahut, W
    Dawson, N
    Daliani, D
    Eisenberger, M
    Figg, WD
    Freidlin, B
    Halabi, S
    Hudes, G
    Hussain, M
    Kaplan, R
    Myers, C
    Oh, W
    Petrylak, DP
    Reed, E
    Roth, B
    Sartor, O
    Scher, H
    Simons, J
    Sinibaldi, V
    Small, EJ
    Smith, MR
    Trump, DL
    Vollmer, R
    Wilding, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (11) : 3461 - 3467
  • [4] BUBLEY GJ, 2000, J CLIN ONCOL, V18, P2644
  • [5] A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LEUPROLIDE WITH AND WITHOUT FLUTAMIDE IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA
    CRAWFORD, ED
    EISENBERGER, MA
    MCLEOD, DG
    SPAULDING, JT
    BENSON, R
    DORR, FA
    BLUMENSTEIN, BA
    DAVIS, MA
    GOODMAN, PJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (07) : 419 - 424
  • [6] CRAWFORD ED, 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V321, P1420
  • [7] Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer
    Eisenberger, MA
    Blumenstein, BA
    Crawford, ED
    Miller, G
    McLeod, DG
    Loehrer, PJ
    Wilding, G
    Sears, K
    Culkin, DJ
    Thompson, IM
    Bueschen, AJ
    Lowe, BA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (15) : 1036 - 1042
  • [8] Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of mitoxantrone/prednisone and Clodronate versus mitoxantrone/prednisone and placebo in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and pain
    Ernst, DS
    Tannock, IF
    Winquist, EW
    Venner, PM
    Reyno, L
    Moore, MJ
    Chi, K
    Ding, K
    Elliott, C
    Parulekar, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) : 3335 - 3342
  • [9] Glucocorticoids and treatment of prostate cancer: A preclinical and clinical review
    Fakih, M
    Johnson, CS
    Trump, DL
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) : 553 - 561
  • [10] Haldar S, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P1253