R&D: A small contribution to productivity growth

被引:44
作者
Comin, D [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Econ, New York, NY 10003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
research and development; productivity growth; total factor productivity;
D O I
10.1007/s10887-004-4541-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article I evaluate the contribution of R&D investments to productivity growth. The basis for the analysis are the free entry condition and the fact that most R&D innovations are embodied. Free entry yields a relationship between the resources devoted to R&D and the growth rate of technology. Since innovators are small, this relationship is not directly affected by the size of R&D externalities, or the presence of aggregate diminishing returns in R&D after controlling for the growth rate of output and the interest rate. The embodiment of R&D-driven innovations bounds the size of the production externalities. The resulting contribution of R&D to productivity growth in the US is smaller than 3-5 tenths of 1% point. This constitutes an upper bound for the case where innovators internalize the consequences of their R&D investments on the cost of conducting future innovations. From a normative perspective, this analysis implies that, if the innovation technology takes the form assumed in the literature, the actual US R&D intensity may be the socially optimal.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 421
页数:31
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[2]   Procyclical productivity: Increasing returns or cyclical utilization? [J].
Basu, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (03) :719-751
[3]   RECONCILING ALTERNATIVE ESTIMATES OF ELASTICITY OF SUBSTITUTION [J].
BERNDT, ER .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1976, 58 (01) :59-68
[4]  
Burnside A.Craig., 1995, NBER MACROECON ANNU, V10, P67, DOI [10.1086/654266, DOI 10.1086/654266]
[5]  
Campbell JY., 1991, NBER WORKING PAPER S
[6]  
COMIN D, 2002, 200201 CV STARR
[7]  
COMIN D, 2004, UNPUB GROWTH VOLATIL
[8]  
DENSION E, 1964, AM ECON REV, V54, P90
[9]   SENSITIVITY OF LEVEL OF OUTPUT TO SAVINGS - EMBODIMENT AND DISEMBODIMENT - CLARIFICATORY NOTE [J].
FISHER, FM ;
LEVHARI, D ;
SHESHINSKI, E .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1969, 83 (02) :347-348
[10]  
Griliches Z., 1992, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, V94, P29, DOI [10.2307/3440244, DOI 10.2307/3440244]