A randomized study of electronic mail versus telephone follow-up after emergency department visit

被引:20
作者
Ezenkwele, UA [1 ]
Sites, FD [1 ]
Shofer, FS [1 ]
Pritchett, EN [1 ]
Hollander, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
emergency department follow-up; electronic mail; telephone contact; discharged patients;
D O I
10.1016/S0736-4679(02)00739-4
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to determine whether electronic mail (e-mail) increases contact rates after patients are discharged from the emergency department (ED). Following discharge, patients were randomized to be contacted by telephone or e-mail. The main outcome was success of contact. Secondary outcome was the median time of response. There were 1561 patients initially screened. Of these, 444 had e-mail and were included in the study. Half were contacted by telephone and the rest via e-mail. Our telephone contact rate was 58% (129/222) after two calls in a 48-h period and our e-mail contact was 41 % (90/222). The telephone was nearly two times better than e-mail. The median time of response was 48 h for e-mail and 18 h for telephone. It is concluded that the telephone is a better modality of contact than e-mail for patients discharged from the ED. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 130
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Inability to follow up ED patients by telephone: There muse be 50 ways to leave your number [J].
Adams, SL ;
Thompson, DA .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 3 (03) :271-273
[2]   The demographics of E-mail for emergency medicine research [J].
Alves, DW ;
Szucs, PA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 19 (03) :192-195
[3]   Electronic communication with patients - Evaluation of distance medicine technology [J].
Balas, EA ;
Jaffrey, F ;
Kuperman, GJ ;
Boren, SA ;
Brown, GD ;
Pinciroli, F ;
Mitchell, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (02) :152-159
[4]  
Bergus GR, 1998, J FAM PRACTICE, V47, P357
[5]   EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SATISFACTION - WHAT MATTERS MOST [J].
BURSCH, B ;
BEEZY, J ;
SHAW, R .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (03) :586-591
[6]   EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WHO LEAVE WITHOUT SEEING A PHYSICIAN - THE TORONTO HOSPITAL EXPERIENCE [J].
FERNANDES, CMB ;
DAYA, MD ;
BARRY, S ;
PALMER, N .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (06) :1092-1096
[7]  
FOSARELLI P, 1985, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, V1, P23
[8]   Academic associate program: Integrating clinical emergency medicine research with undergraduate education [J].
Hollander, JE ;
Valentine, SM ;
Brogan, GX .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 4 (03) :225-230
[9]   TELEPHONE FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS DISCHARGED FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - HOW RELIABLE [J].
HORNE, A ;
ROS, SP .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 1995, 11 (03) :173-175
[10]  
ISSACMAN DJ, 1997, PEDIATR EMERG CARE, V13, P256