What dose of external-beam radiation is high enough for prostate cancer?

被引:140
作者
Eade, Thomas N.
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
Horwitz, Eric M.
Buyyounouski, Mark K.
Hanks, Gerald E.
Pollack, Alan
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 68卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; radiotherapy; dose;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To quantify the radiotherapy dose-response of prostate cancer, adjusted for prognostic factors in a mature cohort of men treated relatively uniformly at a single institution. Patients and Methods: The study cohort consisted of 1,530 men treated with three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiotherapy between 1989 and 2002. Patients were divided into four isocenter dose groups: < 70 Gy (n = 43), 70-74.9 Gy (n = 552), 75-79.9 Gy (n = 568), and 2:80 Gy In = 367). The primary endpoints were freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), defined by American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) and Phoenix (nadir + 2.0 ng/mL) criteria, and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM). Multivariate analyses were performed and adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Logit regression dose-response functions were determined at 5 and 8 years for FFBF and at 5 and 10 years for FFDM. Results: Radiotherapy dose was significant in multivariate analyses for FFBF (ASTRO and Phoenix) and FFDM. Adjusted 5-year estimates of ASTRO FFBF for the four dose groups were 60%, 68%, 76%, and 84%. Adjusted 5-year Phoenix FFBFs for the four dose groups were 70%, 81%, 83%, and 89%. Adjusted 5-year and 10-year estimates of FFDM for the four dose groups were 96% and 93 %, 97 % and 93 %, 99 % and 95 %, and 98 % and 96%. Dose-response functions showed an increasing benefit for doses >= 80 Gy. Conclusions: Doses of >= 80 Gy are recommended for most men with prostate cancer. The ASTRO definition of biochemical failure does not accurately estimate the effects of radiotherapy at 5 years because of backdating, compared to the Phoenix definition, which is less sensitive to follow-up and more reproducible over time. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 689
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Defining biochemical failure after radiotherapy with and without androgen deprivation for prostate cancer [J].
Buyyounouski, MK ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Eisenberg, DF ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Feigenberg, SJ ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (05) :1455-1462
[2]   Biochemical failure and the temporal kinetics of prostate-specific antigen after radiation therapy with androgen deprivation [J].
Buyyounouski, MK ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (05) :1291-1298
[3]   Dose-response characteristics of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy [J].
Cheung, R ;
Tucker, SL ;
Lee, AK ;
De Crevoisier, R ;
Dong, L ;
Kamat, A ;
Pisters, L ;
Kuban, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04) :993-1002
[4]   Dose-response for biochemical control among high-risk prostate cancer patients after external beam radiotherapy [J].
Cheung, R ;
Tucker, SL ;
Dong, L ;
Kuban, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05) :1234-1240
[5]   The Gleason score shift: Score four and seven years ago [J].
Chism, DB ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Troncoso, P ;
Al-Saleem, T ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05) :1241-1247
[6]   Radical radiation for localized prostate cancer: Local persistence of disease results in a late wave of metastases [J].
Coen, JJ ;
Zietman, AL ;
Thakral, H ;
Shipley, WU .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) :3199-3205
[7]  
Cox JD, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P1035
[8]   6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer - A randomized controlled trial [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Manola, J ;
Loffredo, M ;
Renshaw, AA ;
DellaCroce, A ;
Kantoff, PW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (07) :821-827
[9]  
DENNIS JE, 1996, NUMERICAL METHODS UN
[10]   What hypofractionated protocols should be tested for prostate cancer? [J].
Fowler, JF ;
Ritter, MA ;
Chappell, RJ ;
Brenner, DJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (04) :1093-1104