Lack of efficacy of riluzole in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain conditions

被引:36
作者
Galer, BS
Twilling, LL
Harle, J
Cluff, RS
Friedman, E
Rowbotham, MC
机构
[1] UCSF, Pain Clin Res Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Inst Educ & Res Pain & Palliat Care, Dept Pain Med & Palliat Care, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Pain Clin Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1212/WNL.55.7.971
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of riluzole in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain conditions. Background: Both basic and clinical research has demonstrated that drugs with sodium channel and NMDA antagonism can be effective in alleviating neuropathic pain. Riluzole, a drug currently used for treatment of ALS, possesses these properties. It was hypothesized that riluzole would be effective in reducing the pain in subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain. Methods: Two randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were performed at two sites. Study 1 compared 100 mg/day of riluzole (the currently recommended dosage for treatment of ALS) versus placebo, and Study 2 compared 200 mg/day of riluzole versus placebo, Each treatment phase (both studies) was 2 weeks long, separated by 2-week wash-out periods. Outcome measures included change in the score on a 100-mm pain intensity visual analog scale, the Neuropathic Pain Scale, allodynia, hyperalgesia, and preference for study treatment phase. Results: Twenty-two subjects completed Study 1, and 21 subjects completed Study 2. Four subjects (two from each study) discontinued the study because of intolerable side effects. No statistical difference was found for any study outcome measure between riluzole and placebo for either study. In Study 1, pain intensity was more likely to increase than decrease with riluzole (mean treatment difference 8.7 mm; 95% CI -19.5 to +2.1 mm). In Study 2, very slight pain reduction was observed with riluzole compared with placebo (mean treatment difference 1.4 mm; 95% CI -5.1 to +8.0 mm). In both studies, the majority of subjects chose "no change" in pain on the category relief scale after placebo and riluzole treatment phases. On study completion, no treatment preference was reported by 76% of the subjects in Study 1 and by 61% of the subjects in Study 2. Conclusions: Doses of riluzole at (100 mg) or above (200 mg) those used for the treatment of ALS were not effective in alleviating peripheral neuropathic pain.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 975
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Backonja, M ;
Beydoun, A ;
Edwards, KR ;
Schwartz, SL ;
Fonseca, V ;
Hes, M ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Garofalo, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (21) :1831-1836
[2]   CONTRIBUTION OF CENTRAL NEUROPLASTICITY TO PATHOLOGICAL PAIN - REVIEW OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE [J].
CODERRE, TJ ;
KATZ, J ;
VACCARINO, AL ;
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1993, 52 (03) :259-285
[3]  
Devor M., 1990, PAIN SYNDROMES NEURO, P47, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-407-01124-3.50009-5, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-407-01124-3.50009-5]
[4]   The pharmacology and mechanism of action of riluzole [J].
Doble, A .
NEUROLOGY, 1996, 47 (06) :S233-S241
[5]   Painful polyneuropathy [J].
Galer, BS .
NEUROLOGIC CLINICS, 1998, 16 (04) :791-+
[6]   Do patient and physician expectations predict response to pain-relieving procedures? [J].
Galer, BS ;
Schwartz, L ;
Turner, JA .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1997, 13 (04) :348-351
[7]   Effect of riluzole on acute pain and hyperalgesia in humans [J].
Hammer, NA ;
Lilleso, J ;
Pedersen, JL ;
Kehlet, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (05) :718-722
[8]  
Hao JX, 1996, PAIN, V66, P279
[9]   Comparison of three rodent neuropathic pain models [J].
Kim, KJ ;
Yoon, YW ;
Chung, JM .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 113 (02) :200-206
[10]   Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [J].
Mittal, Vijay A. ;
Walker, Elaine F. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 189 (01) :158-159