The problem of the placebo response in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders: Culprits, possible remedies, and a novel study design approach

被引:368
作者
Fava, M
Evins, AE
Dorer, DJ
Schoenfeld, DA
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat,Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Ctr Biostat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
placebo; clinical trials; novel design; sequential; DEPRESSION RATING-SCALE; SMOKING CESSATION; MAJOR DEPRESSION; NICOTINE PATCH; EFFICACY; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1159/000069738
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The placebo response is a major issue in clinical trials for psychiatric disorders. Possible contributing factors to this problem include diagnostic misclassification, issues concerning inclusion/exclusion criteria, outcome measures' lack of sensitivity to change, measurement errors, poor quality of data entry and verification, waxing and waning of the natural course of illness, regression toward the mean phenomenon, patient and clinician expectations about the trial, study design issues, non-specific therapeutic effects, and high attrition. Over the past few decades, researchers have attempted to reduce the placebo effect in a variety of ways. Unfortunately, approaches with very little or no benefit have included restricting enrollment to selected populations, rater training, requirement of same rater, and placebo lead-in phases. Some benefits, although often marginal, have been derived from standardizing diagnostic procedures, managing clinicians' overestimation of change, simplification of study visits and assessments, minimizing nonspecific, therapeutic effects, extending trial duration, reducing number of sites, increasing the sensitivity of outcome measures, and reducing the number of treatment arms. Thus far, there has been no attempt to develop new study designs aimed at reducing the placebo effect. We are proposing a novel study design, called 'Sequential Parallel Comparison Design', suitable for double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in psychiatric disorders. This design is aimed at reducing both the overall placebo response rate and the sample size required for such trials. Its usefulness in clinical research needs to be tested empirically. If this study design were to be found to meet its stated goals, this could markedly facilitate the process of clinical development of new compounds for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 127
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION SCALE - EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVITY USING LOGISTIC-MODELS [J].
BECH, P ;
ALLERUP, P ;
GRAM, LF ;
REISBY, N ;
ROSENBERG, R ;
JACOBSEN, O ;
NAGY, A .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 63 (03) :290-299
[2]  
Campbell DT., 1999, PRIMER REGRESSION AR
[3]  
CHASSAN JB, 1992, RES DESIGNS METHODS, P173
[4]  
CHMURAKRAEMER H, 1987, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V44, P1100
[5]  
Davidson JRT, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V287, P1807, DOI 10.1001/jama.287.14.1807
[6]  
DEBROTA DJ, 2002, 42 ANN NCDEU M BOC R
[7]  
Demitrack MA, 1998, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V34, P19
[8]   The responsiveness of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [J].
Faries, D ;
Herrera, J ;
Rayamajhi, J ;
DeBrota, D ;
Demitrack, M ;
Potter, WZ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (01) :3-10
[9]   The double-blind variable placebo lead-in period: Results from two antidepressant clinical trials [J].
Faries, DE ;
Heiligenstein, JH ;
Tollefson, GD ;
Potter, WZ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 21 (06) :561-568
[10]   Major depressive subtypes and treatment response [J].
Fava, M ;
Uebelacker, LA ;
Alpert, JE ;
Nierenberg, AA ;
Pava, JA ;
Rosenbaum, JF .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 42 (07) :568-576