Scale-Dependent Uncertainties in Global QPFs and QPEs from NWP Model and Satellite Fields

被引:14
作者
Lu, C. [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, H. [3 ]
Tollerud, E. I.
Wang, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, ESRL, NOAA, Global Syst Div, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, CIRA, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; VERIFICATION; RESOLUTION; RAINFALL; MICROWAVE; WAVELET;
D O I
10.1175/2009JHM1164.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Global precipitation forecasts from numerical weather prediction (NWP) models can be verified using the near-global coverage of satellite precipitation retrievals. However, inaccuracies in satellite precipitation analyses complicate the interpretation of forecast errors that result from verification of an NWP model against satellite observations. In this study, assessments of both a global quantitative precipitation estimate (QPE) from a satellite precipitation product and corresponding global quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) from a global NWP model are conducted using available global land-based gauge data. A scale decomposition technique is devised, coupled with seasonal and spatial classifications, to evaluate these inaccuracies. The results are then analyzed in context with various physical precipitation systems, including heavy monsoonal rains, light Mediterranean winter rains, and North American convective-related and midlatitude cyclone-related precipitation. In general, global model results tend to consistently overforecast rainfall, whereas satellite measurements present a mixed pattern, underestimating many large-scale precipitation systems while overestimating many convective-scale precipitation systems. Both global model QPF and satellite-retrieved QPE showed better correlation scores in large-scale precipitation systems when verified with gauge measurements. In this case, model-based QPF tends to outperform satellite-retrieved QPE. At convective scales, there are significant drops in both model QPF and satellite QPE correlation scores, but satellite QPE performs slightly better than model QPF. These general results also showed regional and seasonal variation. For example, in tropical monsoon systems, satellite QPE tended to outperform model-based QPF at both scales. Overall, the results suggest potential improvements for both satellite estimates and weather forecast systems, in particular as applied to global precipitation forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 155
页数:17
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
ADLER RF, 1993, J APPL METEOROL, V32, P335, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<0335:EOMROJ>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
ARAKAWA A, 1993, METEOR MONOGR AM MET, V46, P1
[4]  
ARKIN PA, 1994, B AM METEOROL SOC, V75, P401, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<0401:TGPCPF>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
Beck C., 2004, NEW MONTHLY PRECIPIT
[7]  
BEYLKIN G, 1992, SPIE P, V1862, P39
[8]   Analysis of scale dependence of quantitative precipitation forecast verification: A case-study over the Mackenzie river basin [J].
Bousquet, Olivier ;
Lin, Charles A. ;
Zawadzki, Isztar .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 132 (620) :2107-2125
[9]   A new intensity-scale approach for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts [J].
Casati, B ;
Ross, G ;
Stephenson, DB .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 11 (02) :141-154
[10]   Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas [J].
Davis, Christopher ;
Brown, Barbara ;
Bullock, Randy .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2006, 134 (07) :1772-1784