Factors influencing survival after resection for periampullary neoplasms

被引:121
作者
Bouvet, M
Gamagami, RA
Gilpin, EA
Romeo, O
Sasson, A
Easter, DW
Moossa, AR
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Surg 112E, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Canc, San Diego, CA 92161 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00405-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine predictors of survival after resection for periampullary neoplasms. METHODS: Over a 15-year period, 208 patients underwent laparotomy for periampullary neoplasms. Data were analyzed to assess predictors of survival. RESULTS: Pathologic examination showed pancreatic cancer (n = 136; 65%), ampullary cancer (n = 28; 13%), distal common bile duct cancer (n = 10; 5%), duodenal cancer (n = 4; 2%), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 11; 5%), cystadenocarcinoma (n = 4; 2%), cystadenoma (n = 5; 2%), and other (n = 10; 5%). A total of 129 patients underwent pancreatic resection (71 Whipples, 35 total pancreatectomies, 21 distal pancreatectomies, and 2 partial pancreatectomies) whereas 79 patients were found to be unresectable and underwent palliative bypass and/or biopsy. Median survival was 20.4 months for resectable patients versus 4.5 months for unresectable patients (P <0.001). Of the 129 resected patients, factors significantly (P <0.05) favoring long-term survival on univariate analysis included well-differentiated histology, common bile duct or ampullary adenocarcinoma, early stage, tumor diameter <2 cm, negative margins, and absence of lymph node metastases, perineural, or vascular invasion. Age, sex, race, and type of procedure had no influence on survival. On multivariate analysis, only tumor differentiation appeared independently related to survival. Using Kendall's tau analysis, tumor type and grade correlated significantly with all other predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Of all variables studied, tumor type and poor tumor differentiation in periampullary neoplasms appear to be markers that predict a constellation of other adverse findings. (C) 2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 17
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] CRILE G, 1970, SURG GYNECOL OBSTETR, V130, P1049
  • [2] Evans Douglas B., 1997, P1054
  • [3] PROGNOSTIC INDICATORS FOR SURVIVAL AFTER RESECTION OF PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA
    GEER, RJ
    BRENNAN, MF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (01) : 68 - 72
  • [4] DECREASED MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY AFTER PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY
    GRACE, PA
    PITT, HA
    TOMPKINS, RK
    DENBESTEN, L
    LONGMIRE, WP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 151 (01) : 141 - 149
  • [5] KALSER MH, 1985, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V120, P899
  • [6] Cancer statistics, 1998
    Landis, SH
    Murray, T
    Bolden, S
    Wingo, PA
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1998, 48 (01) : 6 - +
  • [7] THE PLACE OF TOTAL AND EXTENDED TOTAL PANCREATECTOMY IN PANCREATIC-CANCER
    MOOSSA, AR
    SCOTT, MH
    LAVELLEJONES, M
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 8 (06) : 895 - 899
  • [8] LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER RESECTION FOR DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS - IS IT REALLY IMPROVING
    NITECKI, SS
    SARR, MG
    COLBY, TV
    VANHEERDEN, JA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 221 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [9] ADENOCARCINOMA OF PANCREAS - STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF BILIARY BYPASS VS WHIPPLE RESECTION IN GOOD RISK PATIENTS
    SHAPIRO, TM
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1975, 182 (06) : 715 - 721
  • [10] The increasing problem of unusual pancreatic tumors
    Sheehan, M
    Latona, C
    Aranha, G
    Pickleman, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2000, 135 (06) : 644 - 648