Users' guides to the medical literature XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid?

被引:682
作者
Giacomini, MK
Cook, DJ
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Div Gen Med,Evidence Based Med Working Grp, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Div Crit Care,Evidence Based Med Working Grp, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2000年 / 284卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.284.3.357
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Quantitative research is designed to test well-specified hypotheses, determine whether an intervention did more harm than good, and find out how much a risk factor predisposes persons to disease. Equally important, qualitative research offers insight into emotional and experiential phenomena in health care to determine what, how, and why. There are 4 essential aspects of qualitative analysis. First, the participant selection must be well reasoned and their inclusion must be relevant to the research question. Second, the data collection methods must be appropriate for the research objectives and setting. Third, the data collection process, which includes field observation, interviews, and document analysis, must be comprehensive enough to support rich and robust descriptions of the observed events. Fourth, the data must be appropriately analyzed and the findings adequately corroborated by using multiple sources of information, more than 1 investigator to collect and analyze the raw data, member checking to establish whether the participants' viewpoints were adequately interpreted, or by comparison with existing social science theories. Qualitative studies offer an alternative when insight into the research is not well established or when conventional theories seem inadequate.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 362
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PHILOS SOCIAL RES
  • [2] MEDICINE, PRACTICE AND GUIDELINES - THE UNEASY JUNCTURE OF SCIENCE AND ART
    BATTISTA, RN
    HODGE, MJ
    VINEIS, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (07) : 875 - 880
  • [3] GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH - PROCEDURES, CANONS AND EVALUATIVE CRITERIA
    CORBIN, J
    STRAUSS, A
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 1990, 19 (06): : 418 - 427
  • [4] Denzin N.K., 1994, Handbook of qualitative research Thousand Oaks
  • [5] Denzin N.K., 1978, Sociological methods
  • [6] Glaser B., 1967, The Constant Comparitive Method. the Discovery of Grounded Theory, P101
  • [7] Reconcilable differences: The marriage of qualitative and quantitative methods
    Goering, PN
    Streiner, DL
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1996, 41 (08): : 491 - 497
  • [8] Guba EG, 1994, Handbook of qualitative research, P105
  • [9] Hodder I., 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P393
  • [10] ETHICAL ISSUES IN QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH
    HOLLOWAY, I
    WHEELER, S
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 1995, 2 (03) : 223 - 232