The typical Cochrane review: How many trials? How many participants?

被引:38
作者
Mallett, S
Clarke, M
机构
关键词
Cochrane Collaboration; systematic review; meta-analysis; randomized trial;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462302000624
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To describe the number of trials and participants in a typical systematic review from The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Methods: The number of trials in 1,000 Cochrane systematic reviews in issue 1, 2001 of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was counted for three categories of trial: included trials, ongoing trials, and trials awaiting assessment for inclusion. (The term trial is used in this paper, although a small number of Cochrane reviews include studies that are not trials.) The total number of participants in included trials was extracted from a sample of reviews. Results: A total of 9,778 trials were included in the Cochrane reviews. There were a further 356 ongoing trials and 1,138 trials awaiting assessment for inclusion. A typical review contained six included trials. Forty percent of the reviews listed ongoing trials and/or trials awaiting assessment for inclusion. Based on a sample of 258 reviews, the median number of participants per review was 945 (interquartile range, 313 to 2,511) per review and 118 (interquartile range, 60 to 241) per trial. Conclusion: This report is a descriptive study of the number of trials and participants in a typical Cochrane review from The Cochrane Library, issue 1, 2001.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 823
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
BARBUI C, 2001, COCHRANE LIB
[2]  
BATH PMW, 2001, COCHRANE LIB
[3]  
GRAVES P, 2001, COCHRANE LIB
[4]   Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses - A comparison of COCHRANE reviews with articles published in paper-based journals [J].
Jadad, AR ;
Cook, DJ ;
Jones, A ;
Klassen, TP ;
Tugwell, P ;
Moher, M ;
Moher, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :278-280
[5]   Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? [J].
McAuley, L ;
Pham, B ;
Tugwell, P ;
Moher, D .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9237) :1228-1231
[6]  
TOWLER BP, 2001, COCHRANE LIB