Molecular population genetics of social insects

被引:104
作者
Pamilo, P [1 ]
Gertsch, P [1 ]
Thoren, P [1 ]
Seppa, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Genet, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS | 1997年 / 28卷
关键词
dispersal; kin selection; polyandry; polygyny; relatedness;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The life of social insects centers around sedentary colonies that can include individuals belonging to different patrilines or matrilines, with a turnover of reproductives. The colony is a scene for both cooperation and conflicts, and the conceptual framework for the evolution of social life and colony organization is provided by the kin selection theory. Variable molecular markers make it possible to dissect kinship within colonies, identifying patrilines and matrilines and estimating genetic relatednesses. Such markers have been used to test hypotheses on social conflicts between queens and workers (split sex ratio hypothesis), among workers (worker policing hypothesis), and among reproductive females (skew hypothesis). The data from several species of ants, bees, and wasps indicate that workers can obtain information on the genetic heterogeneity of their colonies and use that information to manipulate reproductive decisions. The social structure of colonies and the mode of colony founding affect the population-wide dispersal of sexuals. Populations with multi-queen colonial networks have limited dispersal; females stay in their natal colonies, and mating flights can be restricted. As a result, coexisting queens tend to be related to each other, maintaining the genetic integrity of colonies, and populations become spatially differentiated to an extent that can lead even to socially driven speciation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evolution of social insect colonies, DOI [10.2307/3495984, DOI 10.2307/3495984]
[2]   Molecular phylogenetics of honey bee subspecies (Apis mellifera L) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence [J].
Arias, MC ;
Sheppard, WS .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 1996, 5 (03) :557-566
[3]   Kin recognition in honeybees [J].
Arnold, G ;
Quenet, B ;
Cornuet, JM ;
Masson, C ;
DeSchepper, B ;
Estoup, A ;
Gasqui, P .
NATURE, 1996, 379 (6565) :498-498
[4]   The dissolution of cooperative groups: Mechanisms of queen mortality in incipient fire ant colonies [J].
Balas, MT ;
Adams, ES .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1996, 38 (06) :391-399
[5]  
Banschbach VS, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P285, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04492.x
[6]  
Beye M, 1996, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V83, P424, DOI 10.1007/BF01142068
[7]  
Blanchetot A., 1992, Insect Molecular Biology, V1, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1993.tb00109.x
[8]   GENETIC RELATEDNESS IN HONEYBEES AS ESTABLISHED BY DNA FINGERPRINTING [J].
BLANCHETOT, A .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1991, 82 (05) :391-396
[9]  
Boomsma Jacobus J., 1993, P86
[10]   Split sex ratios and queen-male conflict over sperm allocation [J].
Boomsma, JJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1371) :697-704