Agricultural tariffs or subsidies: Which are more important for developing economies?

被引:43
作者
Hoekman, B [1 ]
Ng, F [1 ]
Olarreaga, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London SW1Y 6LA, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/wber/lhh037
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This article assesses the impact of the world price-depressing effect of agricultural subsidies and border protection in OECD countries on developing economies' exports, imports, and welfare. Developing economy exporters are likely to benefit from reductions in such subsidies and trade barriers, whereas net importers may lose as world prices rise. A simple partial equilibrium model of global trade in commodities that benefit from domestic support or export subsidies is developed to estimate the relevant elasticities. Simulation results suggest that a 50 percent reduction in border protection will have a much larger positive impact on developing economies' exports and welfare than a 50 percent reduction in agricultural subsidies. Although there is significant heterogeneity across developing economies, the results suggest that efforts in the Doha Round of WTO negotiations should be directed at substantially reducing border protection.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 204
页数:30
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ANDERSON K, 2002, TRAD IND POL STRAT T
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2955 WORLD BANK
[3]  
BEGHIN J, 2002, WILL AGR TRADE REFOR
[4]  
Brenton P., 2003, 3018 WORLD BANK
[5]  
DEGORTER H, 2002, AMS DOMESTIC SUPPORT
[6]  
DIMARANAN B, 2002, 1161 GTAP PURD U DEP
[7]  
FALVEY R, 1989, OXFORD ECON PAP, V41, P434
[8]  
FINK C, 2002, WORLD BANK ECON REV, V16, P120
[9]   Formula approaches for market access negotiations [J].
Francois, J ;
Martin, W .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2003, 26 (01) :1-28
[10]  
Francois J. F., 2001, Review of International Economics, V9, P249, DOI [10.1111/1467-9396.00277, DOI 10.1111/1467-9396.00277]