Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability

被引:215
作者
Hansen, TF [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
evolvability; pleiotropy; modularity; genetic constraint; eye evolution; adaptation; adaptability; variability; genetic variance;
D O I
10.1016/S0303-2647(02)00132-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Evolvability is the ability to respond to a selective challenge. This requires the capacity to produce the right kind of variation for selection to act upon. To understand evolvability we therefore need to understand the variational properties of biological organisms. Modularity is a variational property, which has been linked to evolvability. If different characters are able to vary independently, selection will be able to optimize each character separately without interference. But although modularity seems like a good design principle for an evolvable organism, it does not therefore follow that it is the only design that can achieve evolvability. In this essay I analyze the effects of modularity and, more generally, pleiotropy on evolvability. Although, pleiotropy causes interference between the adaptation of different characters, it also increases the variational potential of those characters. The most evolvable genetic architectures may often be those with an intermediate level of integration among characters, and in particular those where pleiotropic effects are variable and able to compensate for each other's constraints. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 94
页数:12
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine neotropical plants: A re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept
    Armbruster, WS
    Di Stilio, VS
    Tuxill, JD
    Flores, TC
    Runk, JLV
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1999, 86 (01) : 39 - 55
  • [2] Adaptive inertia caused by hidden pleiotropic effects
    Baatz, M
    Wagner, GP
    [J]. THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1997, 51 (01) : 49 - 66
  • [3] Berg R., 1960, EVOLUTION, V17, P171
  • [4] Bonner J.T, 1988, The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection
  • [5] BURGER R, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P182, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05729.x
  • [6] Burger R., 2000, The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation
  • [7] Cheverud J, 2001, CHARACTER CONCEPT EV, P411, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012730055-9/50030-6
  • [8] Cheverud JM, 1996, AM ZOOL, V36, P44
  • [9] Cheverud JM, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P2006, DOI [10.2307/2411021, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb05122.x]
  • [10] THE GEOMETRY OF EVOLUTION
    CONRAD, M
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS, 1990, 24 (01) : 61 - 81