Patient tolerance of colonoscopy without sedation during screening examination for colorectal polyps

被引:65
作者
Thiis-Evensen, E
Hoff, GS
Sauar, J
Vatn, MH
机构
[1] Rikshosp Univ Hosp, Dept Med A, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
[2] Telemark Cent Hosp, Dept Med, Skien, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2000.109804
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The administration of sedative drugs at colonoscopy has its drawbacks such as increases in the rate of complications and cost. Our aim was to study how individuals, drawn from a population registry and invited to undergo screening colonoscopy for colorectal polyps, experienced the procedure without conscious sedation. Methods: Four hundred fifty-one individuals underwent the screening examination (median age 67 years, range 63 to 72). The cecum was intubated in 369 (82%). Fourteen days after the examination, 429 of the attendees received a questionnaire designed to evaluate their tolerance of the procedure. Results: Four hundred nine participants (95%) replied. Twenty-one (5%) of these individuals found the examination very uncomfortable, 184 (45%) found it moderately uncomfortable, and 204 (50%) did not find it uncomfortable. A larger proportion of women than men, 110 (63%) versus 79 (41%), found the procedure very or moderately uncomfortable (p < 0.001). Three hundred sixty-eight (90%) individuals stated that they would undergo repeat colonoscopy in 5 years. Conclusion: In this screening setting, routine use of conscious sedation did not seem to be necessary, as most participants found the examination to be only moderately uncomfortable or not at all uncomfortable. Colonoscopy without conscious sedation may, however, reduce the rate of intubation of the cecum and increase the risk of missing adenomas and cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 610
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   RESULTS FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY UNITED-STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION COLLABORATIVE STUDY ON COMPLICATION RATES AND DRUG-USE DURING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
ARROWSMITH, JB ;
GERSTMAN, BB ;
FLEISCHER, DE ;
BENJAMIN, SB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (04) :421-427
[2]   Colonoscopy without sedation - A viable alternative [J].
Cataldo, PA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (03) :257-261
[3]   SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - RESULTS OF A NATIONWIDE SURVEY [J].
DANESHMEND, TK ;
BELL, GD ;
LOGAN, RFA .
GUT, 1991, 32 (01) :12-15
[4]  
Early DS, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P1862
[5]   Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation [J].
Eckardt, VF ;
Kanzler, G ;
Schmitt, T ;
Eckardt, AJ ;
Bernhard, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (05) :560-565
[6]   Colonoscopy without premedication versus barium enema: A comparison of patient discomfort [J].
Eckardt, VF ;
Kanzler, G ;
Willems, D ;
Eckardt, AK ;
Bernhard, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (02) :177-180
[7]  
Farrands P A, 1984, Community Med, V6, P12
[8]   Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: Patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Thorens, J ;
Schwizer, W ;
Preisig, M ;
Kohler, M ;
Hays, RD ;
Fried, M ;
Gonvers, JJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (01) :1-9
[9]   COMPLICATIONS OF DIAGNOSTIC GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
HART, R ;
CLASSEN, M .
ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 22 (05) :229-233
[10]   WHO GETS SCREENED FOR CERVICAL AND BREAST-CANCER - RESULTS FROM A NEW NATIONAL SURVEY [J].
HAYWARD, RA ;
SHAPIRO, MF ;
FREEMAN, HE ;
COREY, CR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 148 (05) :1177-1181