Evaluation of the reliability of chromosomal imbalances detected by combined use of universal DNA amplification and comparative genomic hybridization

被引:18
作者
Harada, T
Shiraishi, K
Kusano, N
Umayahara, K
Kondoh, S
Okita, K
Sasaki, K
机构
[1] Yamaguchi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Yamaguchi 7558505, Japan
[2] Yamaguchi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Yamaguchi 7558505, Japan
[3] Yamaguchi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Yamaguchi 7558505, Japan
来源
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH | 2000年 / 91卷 / 11期
关键词
microdissection; degenerate oligonucleotide primed-PCR (DOP-PCR); comparative genomic hybridization (CGH);
D O I
10.1111/j.1349-7006.2000.tb00894.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of microscopic tumor samples is allowed by universal DNA amplification using degenerate oligonucleotide primed-PCR (DOP-PCR). To evaluate the reliablity of DOP-PCR CGH, we performed DOP-PCR CGH and standard CGH in parallel using DNAs extracted from 10 malignant tumors of the hepatobiliary tract and pancreas. Similar results were obtained by both methods with a few exceptions, indicating that DOP-PCR CGH provides cytogenetic information equivalent to that obtained from standard CGH. We also investigated the sensitivity of DOP-PCR CGH using sequential dilutions of DNA from microdissected tumor cells. DOP-PCR using 100 to 800 pg of template DNA yielded successful CGH results. However, less than 50 pg of template DNA was not suitable because of the small amount of generated DNA. These findings suggest that DOP-PCR CGH is applicable for CGH analysis of tiny specimens which are too small for standard CGH. Accordingly, DOP-PCR CGH analysis may become a useful method in clinical laboratory examination.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1125
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Aubele M, 1998, CANCER CYTOPATHOL, V84, P375, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981225)84:6<375::AID-CNCR10>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-1
[3]   Intratumoral heterogeneity in breast carcinoma revealed by laser-microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization [J].
Aubele, M ;
Mattis, A ;
Zitzelsberger, H ;
Walch, A ;
Kremer, M ;
Hutzler, P ;
Höfler, H ;
Werner, M .
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1999, 110 (02) :94-102
[4]   Whole genome amplification using a degenerate oligonucleotide primer allows hundreds of genotypes to be performed on less than one nanogram of genomic DNA [J].
Cheung, VG ;
Nelson, SF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (25) :14676-14679
[5]   Multiple mutation analyses in single tumor cells with improved whole genome amplification [J].
Dietmaier, W ;
Hartmann, A ;
Wallinger, S ;
Heinmöller, E ;
Kerner, T ;
Endl, E ;
Jauch, KW ;
Hofstädter, F ;
Rüschoff, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 154 (01) :83-95
[6]   A simple and efficient method for microdissection and microFISH [J].
Engelen, JJM ;
Albrechts, JCM ;
Hamers, GJH ;
Geraedts, JPM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1998, 35 (04) :265-268
[7]  
ISOLA JJ, 1995, AM J PATHOL, V147, P905
[8]   Evidence of focal genetic microheterogeneity in glioblastoma multiforme by area-specific CGH on microdissected tumor cells [J].
Jung, V ;
Romeike, BFM ;
Henn, W ;
Feiden, W ;
Moringlane, JR ;
Zang, KD ;
Urbschat, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1999, 58 (09) :993-999
[9]  
Junker K, 1999, ANTICANCER RES, V19, P1487
[10]   COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION FOR MOLECULAR CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF SOLID TUMORS [J].
KALLIONIEMI, A ;
KALLIONIEMI, OP ;
SUDAR, D ;
RUTOVITZ, D ;
GRAY, JW ;
WALDMAN, F ;
PINKEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1992, 258 (5083) :818-821