Interventions to promote walking: systematic review

被引:467
作者
Ogilvie, David [1 ]
Foster, Charles E.
Rothnie, Helen
Cavill, Nick
Hamilton, Val
Fitzsimons, Claire F.
Mutrie, Nanette
机构
[1] MRC, Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Oxford, Promot Res Grp, British Heart Fdn Hlth, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Sport Culture & Arts, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Glasgow, Dev & Alumni Off, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 334卷 / 7605期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.BE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the effects of interventions to promote walking in individuals and populations. Design Systematic review. Data sources Published and unpublished reports in any language identified by searching 25 electronic databases, by searching websites, reference lists, and existing systematic reviews, and by contacting experts. Review methods Systematic search for and appraisal of controlled before and after studies of the effects of any type of intervention on how much people walk, the distribution of effects on walking between social groups, and any associated effects on overall physical activity, fitness, risk factors for disease, health, and wellbeing. Results We included 19 randomised controlled trials and 29 non-randomised controlled studies. Interventions tailored to people's needs, targeted at the most sedentary or at those most motivated to change, and delivered either at the level of the individual (brief advice, supported use of pedometers, telecommunications) or household (individualised marketing) or through groups, can encourage people to walk more, although the sustainability, generalisabitity, and clinical benefits of many of these approaches are uncertain. Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions applied to workplaces, schools, communities, or areas typically depends on isolated studies or subgroup analysis. Conclusions The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term. From a perspective of improving population health, much of the research currently provides evidence of efficacy rather than effectiveness. Nevertheless, interventions to promote walking could contribute substantially towards increasing the activity levels of the most sedentary.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1207
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Compendium of Physical Activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities [J].
Ainsworth, BE ;
Haskell, WL ;
Whitt, MC ;
Irwin, ML ;
Swartz, AM ;
Strath, SJ ;
O'Brien, WL ;
Bassett, DR ;
Schmitz, KH ;
Emplaincourt, PO ;
Jacobs, DR ;
Leon, AS .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (09) :S498-S516
[2]   To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs [J].
Alfonzo, MA .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2005, 37 (06) :808-836
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, LETS MAK SCOTL MOR A
[4]  
[Anonymous], WALK STRAT SCOTL CON
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, The Scottish Health Survey 2003
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LEAST 5 WEEK EV IMP
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 4 COMM US METH INCR
[8]   What health services could do about climate change - They must embrace sustainable development and reduce their ecological footprints [J].
Coote, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7554) :1343-1344
[9]  
Deeks J J, 2003, Health Technol Assess, V7, piii
[10]  
Department of Health, 2004, CHOOS HLTH MAK HLTH