Industrial and ecological cumulative exergy consumption of the United States via the 1997 input-output benchmark model

被引:115
作者
Ukidwe, Nandan U.
Bakshi, Bhavik R.
机构
[1] Solutia Inc, Springfield, MA 01151 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
exergy; cumulative exergy; emergy; ecosystem goods and services; input-output models; US economy;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2006.11.005
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper develops a thermodynamic input-output (TIO) model of the 1997 United States economy that accounts for the flow of cumulative exergy in the 488-sector benchmark economic input-output model in two different ways. Industrial cumulative exergy consumption (ICEC) captures the exergy of all natural resources consumed directly and indirectly by each economic sector, while ecological cumulative exergy consumption (ECEC) also accounts for the exergy consumed in ecological systems for producing each natural resource. Information about exergy consumed in nature is obtained from the thermodynamics of biogeochemical cycles. As used in this work, ECEC is analogous to the concept of emergy, but does not rely on any of its controversial claims. The TIO model can also account for emissions from each sector and their impact and the role of labor. The use of consistent exergetic units permits the combination of various streams to define aggregate metrics that may provide insight into aspects related to the impact of economic sectors on the environment. Accounting for the contribution of natural capital by ECEC has been claimed to permit better representation of the quality of ecosystem goods and services than ICEC. The results of this work are expected to permit evaluation of these claims. If validated, this work is expected to lay the foundation for thermodynamic life cycle assessment, particularly of emerging technologies and with limited information. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1560 / 1592
页数:33
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Adriaanse A., 1997, RESOURCE FLOWS MAT B
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ECO INDICATOR 99 DAM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NASA SURF MET SOL EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, WORLD RESOURCES 2000, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0014479702210194
[6]   Managing ecosystem resources [J].
Arrow, K ;
Daily, G ;
Dasgupta, P ;
Levin, S ;
Maler, KG ;
Maskin, E ;
Starrett, D ;
Sterner, T ;
Tietenberg, T .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) :1401-1406
[7]  
Ayres R. U., 1998, ACCOUNTING RESOURCES
[8]   On the life cycle metaphor: where ecology and economics diverge [J].
Ayres, RU .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (04) :425-438
[9]   Eco-thermodynamics: economics and the second law [J].
Ayres, RU .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 26 (02) :189-209
[10]   The price-value paradox [J].
Ayres, RU .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 25 (01) :17-19