Choice modeling at the "market stall":: Individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation

被引:67
作者
Alvarez-Farizo, Begona
Hanley, Nick
Barberan, Ramon
Lazaro, Angelina
机构
[1] CITA DGA, Unidad Econ, E-50080 Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Univ Stirling, Dept Econ, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[3] Univ Zaragoza, Dpto Econ Aplicada, Fac Econ, E-50001 Zaragoza, Spain
[4] Univ Zaragoza, Dpto Econ Aplicada, Fac Derecho, E-50001 Zaragoza, Spain
关键词
choice modelling; participatory approaches; citizens' juries; environmental valuation; Water Framework Directive;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.01.009
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The market stall, or valuation workshop, has recently been proposed as a way of addressing some of the limitations of conventional stated preference analysis. In this paper, we attempt to combine a participatory technique similar to the "citizens' jury" with choice modelling, a stated preference technique increasingly being applied in environmental economics. Our focus is on how changes in the context of decision-making (between choices made in isolation and those made in a group setting, and between choices made on individual well being versus collective criteria) produce differences in estimated welfare measures. The empirical context used is that of water quality improvements under the Water Framework Directive, the most significant reform in water legislation in the European Union for many years. We find that the choice experiment format can be successfully implemented in a valuation workshop and that moving from individual to collective choice produces, in this instance, a rather interesting change in both values and preferences which depends on the respondent's interests. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 751
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Citizens and wetlands: evaluating the Ely citizens' jury [J].
Aldred, J ;
Jacobs, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 34 (02) :217-232
[2]  
ALDRED J, 1997, CITIZENS WETLANDS WH
[3]   IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC-GOODS - A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING [J].
ANDREONI, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1990, 100 (401) :464-477
[4]  
[Anonymous], CHOICES VALUES FRAME
[5]  
Baumol William J., 1952, WELFARE EC THEORY ST
[6]  
Bennett J., 2001, CHOICE MODELLING APP
[7]   Culture, communication, and the information problem in contingent valuation surveys: a case study of a Wildlife Enhancement Scheme [J].
Burgess, J ;
Clark, J ;
Harrison, C .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2000, 18 (05) :505-524
[8]   I struggled with this money business: respondents' perspectives on contingent valuation [J].
Clark, J ;
Burgess, J ;
Harrison, CM .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 33 (01) :45-62
[9]  
Coote Anna, 1997, Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice
[10]  
Crosby N., 1998, BETTER ENV DECISIONS