Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: Initial experience

被引:88
作者
Rosen, EL [1 ]
Turkington, TG [1 ]
Soo, MS [1 ]
Baker, JA [1 ]
Coleman, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2342040654
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To prospectively assess a dedicated, large field of view positron emission tomography (PET) mammographic device for imaging primary breast carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study, and all patients provided written informed consent prior to participation. Subjects were recruited from a cohort of patients in whom diagnostic mammography and/or ultrasonography demonstrated lesions that were highly suggestive of malignancy. Twenty-three patients who met the inclusion criteria were subsequently imaged by using a dedicated PET mammography unit that was developed in conjunction with the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Newport News, Va). One hour after administration of 2.0-2.5 mCi (74.0-93.5 MBq) of fluorodeoxyglucose, 5-minute PET mammography of the affected breast was performed. Images were processed and reconstructed in the transverse craniocaudal and coronal planes. For each lesion, image-guided core-needle biopsy was performed immediately after PET mammography. Conventional mammography results and histologic findings were correlated with PET mammography images. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of PET mammography for demonstrating malignant lesions were calculated. RESULTS: PET mammography demonstrated 20 focal abnormalities, of which 18 were malignant and two were benign. Both benign lesions represented areas of fat necrosis. Three of 20 malignant lesions demonstrated at conventional mammography were not demonstrated at PET mammography. The overall sensitivity of PET mammography for malignancy was 86% (95% confidence interval: 65%, 95%), with a positive predictive value of 90% (95% confidence interval: 70%, 97%). The calculated specificity was 33% (95% confidence interval: 2%, 79%), and the negative predictive value was 25% (95% confidence interval: 1%, 70%). CONCLUSION: These pilot data suggest that PET mammography can demonstrate small primary breast malignancies. (C) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 534
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Avril N, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P1186
[2]  
Avril N, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P9
[3]   Biologic correlates of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography [J].
Bos, R ;
van der Hoeven, JJM ;
van der Wall, E ;
van der Groep, P ;
van Diest, PJ ;
Comans, EFI ;
Joshi, U ;
Semenza, GL ;
Hoekstra, OS ;
Lammertsma, AA ;
Molthoff, CFM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) :379-387
[4]   Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging [J].
Freifelder, R ;
Karp, JS .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (12) :2463-2480
[5]   Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET [J].
Goerres, GW ;
Michel, SCA ;
Fehr, MK ;
Kaim, AH ;
Steinert, HC ;
Seifert, B ;
von Schulthess, GK ;
Kubik-Huch, RA .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (07) :1635-1644
[6]   Measuring [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy:: comparison of analytical methods [J].
Krak, NC ;
van der Hoeven, JJM ;
Hoekstra, OS ;
Twisk, JWR ;
van der Wall, E ;
Lammertsma, AA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (05) :674-681
[7]   Positron emission mammography: Initial clinical results [J].
Levine, EA ;
Freimanis, RI ;
Perrier, ND ;
Morton, K ;
Lesko, NM ;
Bergman, S ;
Geisinger, KR ;
Williams, RC ;
Sharpe, C ;
Zavarzin, V ;
Weinberg, IN ;
Stepanov, PY ;
Beylin, D ;
Lauckner, K ;
Doss, M ;
Lovelace, J ;
Adler, LP .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (01) :86-91
[8]   The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories [J].
Liberman, L ;
Abramson, AF ;
Squires, FB ;
Glassman, JR ;
Morris, EA ;
Dershaw, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :35-40
[9]   Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) [J].
Liberman, L ;
Menell, JH .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 40 (03) :409-+
[10]   Quantification in Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) with planar detectors: Contrast resolution measurements using a custom breast phantom and novel spherical hot-spots [J].
Murthy, K ;
Jolly, D ;
Aznar, M ;
Thompson, CJ ;
Sciascia, P ;
Loutfi, A ;
Lisbona, R ;
Gagnon, JH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1999, 46 (06) :2192-2196