Instantaneous Inhibitory Potential Is Similar to Inhibitory Quotient at Predicting HIV-1 Response to Antiretroviral Therapy

被引:11
作者
Henrich, Timothy J. [1 ,2 ]
Ribaudo, Heather J. [3 ]
Kuritzkes, Daniel R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
NAIVE HIV-1-INFECTED PATIENTS; INITIAL TREATMENT; COMBINATION THERAPY; LOPINAVIR-RITONAVIR; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; TENOFOVIR DF; OPEN-LABEL; EFAVIRENZ; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1086/653430
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The instantaneous inhibitory potential (IIP), a measure of antiviral activity that incorporates the slope of the dose-response curve, has been proposed as a better predictor of clinical efficacy than the inhibitory quotient (IQ). However, there are no quantitative analyses supporting this hypothesis. Methods. The correlation between differences in log(10) (IQ) (Delta log(10) (IQ))or differences in IIP (Delta IIP) and the differences in percentage of subjects with plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels <50 copies/mL at week 48 was determined for antiretroviral drugs compared in 17 randomized clinical trials. The Delta log(10) (IQ(min)), Delta log(10) (IQ(max)), Delta IIPmin, Delta IIPmax, Delta log(10) (IQ(12)), Delta log(10) (IQ(24)), Delta IIP12, and Delta IIP24 and for comparative drugs were correlated with differences in percentage of subjects with HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL in each trial. log(10) (IQ(24)), log(10) (IQ(12)), IIP24, and IIP12 and were calculated using published median effect model slope values and t(1/2) values; r(2) values from linear regression and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for each analysis; and correlation coefficients were compared between log(10) (IQ) and IIP. Results. r(2) values were greatest for the Delta log(10) (IQ(12)) and Delta log(10) (IQ(24)) comparisons using intention-to-treat outcomes from the 17 trials. Differences in r(2) values between Delta log(10) (IQ(24)) and Delta IIP24 and between Delta log(10) (IQ(12)) and Delta IIP12 were 0.05 and 0.18, respectively. Differences in Spearman rank correlation coefficients between log(10) (IQ) and IIP at each drug concentration were not significantly different, with the exception of Delta log(10) (IQ(max)) and Delta IIPmax; the Delta log(10) (IQ(max)) correlation was significantly stronger than the Delta IIPmax correlation. Conclusions. IIP was not substantially better than log(10) (IQ) in describing the modest relationship between antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, and virologic outcomes for antiretroviral drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 98
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   DERIVATION AND PROPERTIES OF MICHAELIS-MENTEN TYPE AND HILL TYPE EQUATIONS FOR REFERENCE LIGANDS [J].
CHOU, TC .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1976, 59 (02) :253-276
[2]   QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF DOSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS - THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE-DRUGS OR ENZYME-INHIBITORS [J].
CHOU, TC ;
TALALAY, P .
ADVANCES IN ENZYME REGULATION, 1984, 22 :27-55
[3]  
Dragsted UB, 2005, ANTIVIR THER, V10, P735
[4]   Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: The MaxCmin1 trial [J].
Dragsted, UB ;
Gerstoft, J ;
Pedersen, C ;
Peters, B ;
Duran, A ;
Obel, N ;
Castagna, A ;
Cahn, P ;
Clumeck, N ;
Bruun, JN ;
Benetucci, J ;
Hill, A ;
Cassetti, I ;
Vernazza, P ;
Youle, M ;
Fox, Z ;
Lundgren, JD .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 188 (05) :635-642
[5]   The KLEAN study of fosamprenavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacovir-lamivudine, for initial treatment of HIV infection over 48 weeks: a randomised non-inferiority trial (vol 368, pg 476, 2006) [J].
Eron, Joseph, Jr. ;
Yeni, Patrick ;
Gathe, Joseph .
LANCET, 2006, 368 (9543) :1238-1238
[6]   Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV [J].
Gallant, JE ;
DeJesus, E ;
Arribas, JR ;
Pozniak, AL ;
Gazzard, B ;
Campo, RE ;
Lu, B ;
McColl, D ;
Chuck, S ;
Enejosa, J ;
Toole, JJ ;
Cheng, AK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (03) :251-260
[7]   Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavuldine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients - A 3-year randomized trial [J].
Gallant, JE ;
Staszewski, S ;
Pozniak, AL ;
DeJesus, E ;
Suleiman, JMAH ;
Miller, MD ;
Coakley, DF ;
Lu, B ;
Toole, JJ ;
Cheng, AK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (02) :191-201
[8]   Triple-nucleoside regimens versus efavirenz-containing regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection [J].
Gulick, RM ;
Ribaudo, HJ ;
Shikuma, CM ;
Lustgarten, S ;
Squires, KE ;
Meyer, WA ;
Acosta, EP ;
Schackman, BR ;
Pilcher, CD ;
Murphy, RL ;
Maher, WE ;
Witt, MD ;
Reichman, RC ;
Snyder, S ;
Klingman, KL ;
Kuritzkes, DR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (18) :1850-1861
[9]  
HILL AV, 1910, P PHYSL SOC, pR4
[10]  
Hoefnagel JGM, 2005, ANTIVIR THER, V10, P879