Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension - A randomized controlled trial

被引:564
作者
Bakris, GL
Fonseca, V
Katholi, RE
McGill, JB
Messerli, FH
Phillips, RA
Raskin, P
Wright, JT
Oakes, R
Lukas, MA
Anderson, KM
Bell, DSH
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Dept Med, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] St Johns Hosp, Dept Med, Springfield, IL USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[6] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Dept Med, New York, NY 10025 USA
[7] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[8] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Med, Dallas, TX USA
[9] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[10] Louis Stokes Cleveland Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[11] GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA USA
[12] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 292卷 / 18期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.292.18.2227
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context beta-Blockers have been shown to decrease cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM); however, some components of the metabolic syndrome are worsened by some beta-blockers. Objective To compare the effects of beta-blockers with different pharmacological profiles on glycemic and metabolic control in participants with DM and hypertension receiving renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade, in the context of cardiovascular risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial (The Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus: Carvedilol-Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensives [GEMINI]) conducted between June 1, 2001, and April 6, 2004, at 205 US sites that compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate on glycemic control. The 1235 participants were aged 36 to 85 years with hypertension (>130/80 mm Hg) and type 2 DM (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], 6.5%-8.5%) and were receiving RAS blockers. Participants were followed up for 35 weeks. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive a 6.25- to 25-mg dose of carvedilol (n=498)or 50- to 200-mg dose of metoprolol tartrate (n=737),each twice daily. open-label hydrochlorothiazide and a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist were added, if needed, to achieve blood pressure target. Main Outcome Measures Difference between groups in mean change from baseline HbA(1c) following 5 months of maintenance therapy. Additional prespecified comparisons included change from baseline HbA(1c) in individual treatment groups, treatment effect on insulin sensitivity, and microalbuminuria. Results The 2 groups differed in mean change in HbA(1c) from baseline (0.13%; 95% confidence interval [CI],-0.22% to-0.04%; P=.004; modified intention-to-treat analysis). The mean (SD) HbA(1c) increased with metoprolol (0.15% [0.04%]; P<.001) but not carvedilol (0.02% [0.04%]; P=.65). Insulin sensitivity improved with carvedilol (-9.1%; P=.004) but not metoprolol (-2.0%; P=.48); the between-group difference was -7.2% (95% CI, -13.8% to -0.2%; P=.004). Blood pressure was similar between groups. Progression to microalbuminuria was less frequent with carvedilol than with metoprolol (6.4% vs 10.3%; odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97; P=.04). Conclusions Both beta-blockers were well tolerated; use of carvedilol in the presence of RAS blockade did not affect glycemic control and improved some components of the metabolic syndrome relative to metoprolol in participants with DM and hypertension. The effects of the 2 beta-blockers on clinical outcomes need to be compared in long-term clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:2227 / 2236
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] The treatment of hypertension in adult patients with diabetes
    Arauz-Pacheco, C
    Parrott, MA
    Raskin, P
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (01) : 134 - 147
  • [2] BAKRIS G, IN PRESS J DIAB COMP
  • [3] Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Chobanian, AV
    Bakris, GL
    Black, HR
    Cushman, WC
    Green, LA
    Izzo, JL
    Jones, DW
    Materson, BJ
    Oparil, S
    Wright, JT
    Roccella, EJ
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) : 1206 - 1252
  • [4] The prevalence of diabetes in the Kingdom of Tonga
    Colagiuri, S
    Colagiuri, R
    Na'ati, S
    Muimuiheata, S
    Hussain, Z
    Palu, T
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (08) : 1378 - 1383
  • [5] Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE):: a randomised trial against atenolol
    Dahlöf, B
    Devereux, RB
    Kjeldsen, SE
    Julius, S
    Beevers, G
    de Faire, U
    Fyhrquist, F
    Ibsen, H
    Kristiansson, K
    Lederballe-Pedersen, O
    Lindholm, LH
    Nieminen, MS
    Omvik, P
    Oparil, S
    Wedel, H
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9311) : 995 - 1003
  • [6] DORNHORST A, 1985, LANCET, V1, P123
  • [7] Ehmer B, 1988, Drugs, V36 Suppl 6, P136
  • [8] FEHER M, 1990, J HUM HYPERTENS, V4, P7
  • [9] Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Gaede, P
    Vedel, P
    Larsen, N
    Jensen, GVH
    Parving, H
    Pedersen, O
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (05) : 383 - 393
  • [10] Controlled study of the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition versus calcium-entry blockade on insulin sensitivity in overweight hypertensive patients: Trandolapril Italian study (TRIS)
    Galletti, F
    Strazzullo, P
    Capaldo, B
    Carretta, R
    Fabris, F
    Ferrara, LA
    Glorioso, N
    Semplicini, A
    Mancini, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 17 (03) : 439 - 445