Biomechanical characterization of human amniotic membrane preparations for ocular surface reconstruction

被引:22
作者
Chuck, RS
Graff, JM
Bryant, MR
Sweet, PM
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Ophthalmol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Ophthalmol, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Biomed Engn, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Dept Ophthalmol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
amniotic membrane; biomechanical properties; transplant; ocular surface reconstruction;
D O I
10.1159/000081637
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the tensile and elastic properties of both commercially available and experimental human amniotic membrane preparations. Method: Nine preparations of human amniotic membrane were studied. The four dry preparations were untreated (nonirradiated, n = 20), and gamma (n = 25), low-dose (AmbioDry(R), Okto Ophtho Inc., Costa Mesa, Calif., USA, n = 20) and high-dose ( n = 20) electron beam sterilized. The same dry membranes were moistened with balanced salt solution ( n = 20, 34, 20 and 20, respectively). The ninth group consisted of thawed medium-frozen amniotic membrane (AmnioGraft(R), Bio-Tissue Inc., Miami, Fla., USA, n = 20). The membranes were cut into thin strips, loaded on a gram range load sensor, and stretched incrementally to the point of rupture. The modulus of elasticity, displacement until rupture and maximum tolerated stress were recorded and compared. Results: The dry preparations exhibited higher moduli of elasticity when compared with the moist samples, with the low-dose electron beam-irradiated samples having the greatest mean modulus of elasticity overall and maintaining a high modulus of elasticity as a moist sample (p < 0.05). Moist nonirradiated preparations and thawed medium-frozen preparations stretched the farthest before rupture and experienced the greatest mean stresses at the point of rupture. While 3 of 4 membranes had greater stretch when moistened as compared to their dry counterparts, there was no difference in the membrane stiffness between dry and moistened low-dose electron beam-irradiated samples (p > 0.8). Conclusions: Low-dose electron beam-irradiated amnion appeared to maintain desirable elastic characteristics in transition from a dry to rehydrated state and may thus provide an easy-to-manipulate transplant tissue for ocular surface reconstruction. Moist nonirradiated and thawed medium-frozen tissues, however, may provide surgical advantages as they required greater forces to rupture. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 348
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Amniotic membrane grafts, "fresh" or frozen? A clinical and in vitro comparison [J].
Adds, PJ ;
Hunt, CJ ;
Dart, JKG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (08) :905-907
[2]   Amniotic membrane transplantation after the primary surgical management of band keratopathy [J].
Anderson, DF ;
Prabhasawat, P ;
Alfonso, E ;
Tseng, SCG .
CORNEA, 2001, 20 (04) :354-361
[3]   Reconstruction of ocular surface with heterologous limbal epithelium and amniotic membrane in a rabbit model [J].
Avila, M ;
España, M ;
Moreno, C ;
Peña, C .
CORNEA, 2001, 20 (04) :414-420
[4]   Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction [J].
Azuara-Blanco, A ;
Pillai, CT ;
Dua, HS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 83 (04) :399-402
[5]  
BATMANOV YY, 1990, VESTN OFTALMOL, P17
[6]  
BRYANT MR, 1994, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V35, P3022
[7]   Amniotic membrane transplantation for severe neurotrophic corneal ulcers [J].
Chen, HJ ;
Pires, RTF ;
Tseng, SCG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 84 (08) :826-833
[8]  
de Rotth A, 1940, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V23, P522
[9]   Amniotic membrane transplantation for reconstruction after excision of large ocular surface neoplasias [J].
Espana, EM ;
Prabhasawat, P ;
Grueterich, M ;
Solomon, A ;
Tseng, SCG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 86 (06) :640-645
[10]   Cross-linking of amniotic membranes [J].
Fujisato, T ;
Tomihata, K ;
Tabata, Y ;
Iwamoto, Y ;
Burczak, K ;
Ikada, Y .
JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE-POLYMER EDITION, 1999, 10 (11) :1171-1181