Indicators of carbon emission intensity from commercial energy use in India

被引:86
作者
Nag, B [1 ]
Parikh, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Inst Dev Res, Bombay 400065, Maharashtra, India
关键词
decomposition; divisia; intensity; structural effects; fuel mix; fuel quality;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00032-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study tries to analyze the commercial energy consumption evolution patterns in India in terms of primary energy requirements and final energy consumption and their implications for overall carbon intensity of the economy. The relative contribution and impact of different factors such as activity levels, structural changes, energy intensity, fuel mix and fuel quality on the changes in aggregate carbon intensity of the economy has been studied, taking into account coal quality which has declined drastically in the last mio decades. The major findings of the study are: firstly, from the 1980s onwards, income effect has been the major determinant of India's per capita emission increase, although prior to that, energy intensity used to be the most important factor. Secondly, there has been a major shift towards electricity from primary energy carriers in the major energy consuming sectors, and the higher end use-efficiency of electricity has been able to compensate for the high emission coefficient of electricity consumption. Thirdly, emission intensity of thermal power generation shows a substantial decline when the data is controlled for the declining quality of coal used in power generation. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classifications: Q41; O53.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 461
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*ADB, 1993, EL UT DAT BOOK AS PA
[2]  
*ADB, 1992, EN IND DEV MEMB COUN
[3]  
*AEEMTRC, 1994, AS EN REV AS EC EN M
[4]   DECOMPOSITION OF INDUSTRIAL ENERGY-CONSUMPTION - SOME METHODOLOGICAL AND APPLICATION ISSUES [J].
ANG, BW ;
LEE, SY .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1994, 16 (02) :83-92
[5]   Decomposition of energy-induced CO2 emissions in manufacturing [J].
Ang, BW ;
Pandiyan, G .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1997, 19 (03) :363-374
[6]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH, CARRYING-CAPACITY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
ARROW, K ;
BOLIN, B ;
COSTANZA, R ;
DASGUPTA, P ;
FOLKE, C ;
HOLLING, CS ;
JANSSON, BO ;
LEVIN, S ;
MALER, KG ;
PERRINGS, C ;
PIMENTEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5210) :520-521
[7]   Cross-country comparison on energy efficiency indicators: the on-going European effort towards a common methodology [J].
Bosseboeuf, D ;
Chateau, B ;
Lapillonne, B .
ENERGY POLICY, 1997, 25 (7-9) :673-682
[8]  
Boyd G., 1987, ENERGY J, P77, DOI DOI 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-V0L8-N02-6
[9]   DECOMPOSITION OF CHANGES IN ENERGY INTENSITY - A COMPARISON OF THE DIVISIA INDEX AND OTHER METHODS [J].
BOYD, GA ;
HANSON, DA ;
STERNER, T .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1988, 10 (04) :309-312
[10]  
Cole M.A., 1997, Environment and Development Economics, V2, P401, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1355770X97000211