The what, when, and how of preservice teachers and literacy across the disciplines: A systematic literature review of nearly 50 years of research

被引:50
作者
Scott, Chyllis E. [1 ]
McTigue, Erin M. [2 ]
Miller, Diane M. [3 ]
Washburn, Erin K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Teaching & Learning, 4505 S Maryland Pkwy,Box 453005, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Univ Stavanger, Natl Reading Ctr Norway, Stavanger, Norway
[3] Univ Houston Downtown, Dept Urban Educ, Houston, TX USA
[4] SUNY Binghamton, Coll Educ, Vestal, NY 13850 USA
关键词
Content-area literacy; Disciplinary literacy; Preservice teachers; Reading and writing across the curriculum; Systematic literature review; AREA READING COURSE; MATHEMATICS TEACHERS; PERSPECTIVES; ATTITUDES; ENGLISH; SCIENCE; SCHOOL; INTERVENTIONS; ADOLESCENTS; CURRICULUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.010
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To organize nearly five decades of research regarding teacher preparation in literacy across the disciplines, this study systematically examined and qualitatively synthesized the what, when, and how of the research, resulting in three overarching categories: (a) perceptions, (b) resistance, and (c) experience. Key findings include that when preservice teachers receive instruction through coursework and practicums, their perceptions toward providing literacy instruction in future teaching contexts became more positive. However, researchers often measured such instruction's effect upon content-area literacy courses in the short term, rarely exploring future classroom implementation. Additionally, recommendations for practice and implications for future research are given. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 91 条
[61]   PREPARING NOVICE HISTORY TEACHERS TO MEET STUDENTS' LITERACY NEEDS [J].
Nokes, Jeffery D. .
READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 31 (06) :493-523
[62]  
Nourie B.L., 1998, CLEARING HOUSE, V71, P372
[63]   PRESERVICE TEACHERS PERSPECTIVES ON WHY EVERY TEACHER IS NOT A TEACHER OF READING - A QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS [J].
OBRIEN, DG ;
STEWART, RA .
JOURNAL OF READING BEHAVIOR, 1990, 22 (02) :101-129
[64]   WHY CONTENT LITERACY IS DIFFICULT TO INFUSE INTO THE SECONDARY-SCHOOL - COMPLEXITIES OF CURRICULUM, PEDAGOGY, AND SCHOOL CULTURE [J].
OBRIEN, DG ;
STEWART, RA ;
MOJE, EB .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1995, 30 (03) :442-463
[65]   Preservice Science and Mathematics Teachers and Discursive Metaknowledge of Text [J].
Olson, Mark R. ;
Truxaw, Mary P. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2009, 52 (05) :422-431
[66]  
Park J.Y., 2013, ENGL EDUC-US, V45, P361
[67]   Secondary Preservice Teachers' Development of Teaching Scientific Writing [J].
Pytash, Kristine E. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2013, 24 (05) :793-810
[68]   Engaging Preservice Teachers in Disciplinary Literacy Learning Through Writing [J].
Pytash, Kristine E. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2012, 55 (06) :527-538
[69]  
Rainey E., 2012, ENGL EDUC-US, V45, P71
[70]   Disciplinary Literacy in English Language Arts: Exploring the Social and Problem-Based Nature of Literary Reading and Reasoning [J].
Rainey, Emily C. .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2017, 52 (01) :53-71